Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Plane crash in the Hudson

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    4,342

    Plane crash in the Hudson

    An amazing job on behalf of the pilot, so far everyone has survived




    plane crash in hudson - Google News
    Series 3 cab chassis, rebuild project

    RIP 2006 Discovery 3
    RIP 2004 V8 Discovery
    RIP 95 Discovery TDI

    RIP 1999 Freelander
    RIP 1978 EX Army FFR

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    20,079
    It is suggested that this is the first ever successful ditching of a commercial jet airliner. The aircraft is apparently largely undamaged, and remains afloat. There were no significant injuries or loss of life. The ditching, a few minutes after takeoff is reported to have been due to the ingestion of a flock of birds causing the failure of two engines.

    The captain, a very experienced ex-military pilot, seems to have done a very good job, perhaps helped by the fact that this is one of the newest basic designs flying.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    mcrover Guest
    Pretty amazing, he should now be sent out to teach all the other pilots in the world how to do it.

    We have a massive problem with birds on our course and ive thought about it a few times how they deal with the birds on Capital GC which is at the end of the main runway at Moorabbin airport .

    We use a gas gun and do the odd cull (Corellas only due to permit constraints) but the wide areas and permanent water attracts thousands of gulls, Corellas and ducks to our course and I would expect the same at Capital.

    They must have thousands of bird strikes a year but I think most of their traffic is prop aircraft.

    Tulla has a golf course nearby but they never have water but I dont know how their bird situation is either.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    2,006
    Quote Originally Posted by mcrover View Post
    Tulla has a golf course nearby but they never have water but I dont know how their bird situation is either.
    Remember a few years when a fox got sucked into the engine of a plane taking off at Tulla? Virgin plane? Trashed one of the engines.

    cheers, DL

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    525
    I don't know about it being the first

    theres this one English Russia St. Petersburg Water Landing but still very impressive to get everyone off without serious injury

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    20,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Distortion View Post
    I don't know about it being the first

    theres this one English Russia St. Petersburg Water Landing but still very impressive to get everyone off without serious injury
    Probably not in many databases - as the article says, it was kept secret to avoid affecting sales of aircraft!

    There are probably other examples as well, just not in the ICAO database for various reasons.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Williams West Aust
    Posts
    21,057
    Well done to the pilot,textbook water landing.
    Would more likeley to be **** than class thou.
    Low altitude,low speed gentle landing,like skiping a stone on a pond.
    Coming fom much higher at much greater speed would have been catastrophic.Great to see no deaths involved.
    Andrew
    DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
    Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
    Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
    Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
    2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
    I made the 1 millionth AULRO post

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by LandyAndy View Post
    Coming fom much higher at much greater speed would have been catastrophic.
    Andrew

    That's usually fairly catastrophic on a runway as well.


    Martyn

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    20,079
    Given proper piloting skills, touchdown speed is not dependent on the height you are descending from. In this case he was lucky it was dead flat water, and probably had the skill to touch down at the minimum possible speed, and with almost no vertical speed, estimating the target speed such that lifting the nose to check descent stalled the aircraft as it touched the surface with the rear fuselage. This would give the minimum possible forward speed, and ensure that it did not become airborne again as the nose came down and the wings unstalled, as it was now below stalling speed. The major impacts would have been when the engines entered the water and acted as brakes - it was obviously critical to ensure that these entered the water simultaneously to avoid their slewing the plane sideways, which would almost certainly have caused a wing to dig in with disastrous results.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NSW , Pennant Hills
    Posts
    3,476
    Full Credit to the Pilot , apparently he had stayed back until all passenger and crew had left the plane and he personally walked up and down the fuse-lodge to make sure no passengers been left behind and then finally left the plane.

    hope I have not make any spelling and gramatical errors as English is my 2nd language.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!