Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33

Thread: identifying a GM diesel engine?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,794
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
    LARC 5 I did my training in had Cummins power, but wouldn't have been surprised to hear of alternate engines.

    Pete
    555 (triple 5) or more commonly called triple trouble? Basiclly a NA VT 190
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Central Queensland
    Posts
    3,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    according to wikipedia the LARC spec 6-71's were a 165hp unit.....

    Brian, what would you reccomend re: transmission and differentials? i know where i can source a 2 speed diff from a early/mid 50's chev

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,794
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprint View Post
    according to wikipedia the LARC spec 6-71's were a 165hp unit.....

    Brian, what would you reccomend re: transmission and differentials? i know where i can source a 2 speed diff from a early/mid 50's chev
    6 ser 9/10/13sp roadranger, they may be hard to find but a 9 ser would do.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Central Queensland
    Posts
    3,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    wouldnt that be a bit of overkill for a 5 ton truck?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,794
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprint View Post
    wouldnt that be a bit of overkill for a 5 ton truck?
    Be the easiest option for finding flywheel housing for the GM.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Central Queensland
    Posts
    3,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    any idea what it'd be like on fuel compared to something like a 7.3L powerstroke V8 from a F350?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,794
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprint View Post
    any idea what it'd be like on fuel compared to something like a 7.3L powerstroke V8 from a F350?
    I believe driven sensibly they can be ok, lots of options to get GMs marching. I've never owned one, ask someone ancient like Brian
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A 6-71 will chew up and spit out a 610/613 Fuller if you work it to capacity. You need a 9509/910/9513/915. Dont bother with two speed diffs if you have a range change trans. Two speed diffs are Fred Flintstone vintage crap, obsolete by 1960. Flywheel and flywheel housing on automotive spec 6-71 engines is usually SAE #2. Go around some specialist truck wreckers. Fuel usage on my 8V92TA's was comparable with other engines doing the same work. The couple of 53 series I owned were heavy on fuel but I feel in hindsight that this was because they were really too small for the job and were working their rings out just about all the time.
    URSUSMAJOR

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,794
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    A 6-71 will chew up and spit out a 610/613 Fuller if you work it to capacity. You need a 9509/910/9513/915. Dont bother with two speed diffs if you have a range change trans. Two speed diffs are Fred Flintstone vintage crap, obsolete by 1960. Flywheel and flywheel housing on automotive spec 6-71 engines is usually SAE #2. Go around some specialist truck wreckers. Fuel usage on my 8V92TA's was comparable with other engines doing the same work. The couple of 53 series I owned were heavy on fuel but I feel in hindsight that this was because they were really too small for the job and were working their rings out just about all the time.
    If the 71 is set below 200 hp the 6 ser box will handle it Brian, the hardest thing would be finding one these days.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    If the 71 is set below 200 hp the 6 ser box will handle it Brian, the hardest thing would be finding one these days.
    That combination is right on the limit of a 600 series capacity. A used or rebuilt box will not be as strong. OK for light work but if you push the power through it regularly you will have a short-lived transmission. 900 series were always put behind a 6-71 for prime mover or dog trailer work. At White Motor we never built anything with a 600 series transmission. Truckies could stuff 900 series so why risk the lighter box to their tender care.
    URSUSMAJOR

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!