The biggest single problem with the existing Defender increasing its sales in Australia is lack of dealers and lousy support. Without this it does not exist on the radar of most potential buyers. Lack of front airbags means it cannot be bought by many industrial and mining concerns. Lack of an automatic transmission is not a major detriment, although it is one, certainly for commercial users, where the automatic minimises driver damage.
In my view, the engine size is a relatively minor concern, that affects mainly the recreational market - and I suspect Landrover's secret view would be that most of these customers should buy the Discovery if that is important.
Interior space is a definite problem, but so it is with many of the direct competitors in the commercial market - tried the baack of a dual cab Hilux lately? And while, as I have stated before, Landrover should have widened the body instead of fitting wheel spats in 1983, the simple fact is that widening or making other dimensional alterations to the body, requires tooling changes that are very large considering the volumes sold. And make a completely new design based on the D3 platform look very attractive in comparison.
There is no doubt this could make a very attractive vehicle for these potential customers, but without dealers it will not be successful here, and it is also doubtful whether it could be considered a "real" Defender (whatever that is - remembering that the name Defender was only introduced in 1989 to replace Landrover when this was changed from a type of vehicle to a company name, to use some of the gloss off the historic Series Landrover to market the Discovery.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Bookmarks