It's not USS Regan - it's USS Ronald Reagan. :p
Printable View
It's not USS Regan - it's USS Ronald Reagan. :p
nuclear power, that's where the future is! :D
if only the hippies didn't keep getting their way...
Yep getting on Par with Australia now, whats the world coming too.. And here is a real article..
Britain orders two massive new aircraft carriers
http://bp3.blogger.com/_PGfQdL-RoDk/...ritish+CVF.jpgToday, the British government announced a twenty percent increase in military spending over the next three years. This amounts to an extra £7.7 billion (€11.5 billion) in funding, which will take the national defence budget up from £33 billion (€49 billion) in 2007 to £36.9 billion (€55 billion) in 2011. Not only will this additional funding sustain Britain’s position as the world’s second biggest military spender, but it will also pay for two massive new aircraft carriers, the first of which was ordered today by the Ministry of Defence for the Royal Navy. Costing nearly £2 billion (€2.98 billion) apiece, these vessels will be by far the largest and most powerful ever operated by the United Kingdom—or any other part of the European Union.
Set to be named HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales, the new aircraft carriers will greatly improve Britain’s ability to mount expeditionary warfare in foreign lands and seas. As Des Browne, the defence secretary, said:
Did anyone read in the Financial Review on Friday the article by a US defence analyst which proposed that US Aircraft carriers are now facing obsolescence due to new tactics being adopted by China and others.
Apparently a war game in 2002 had half of the US fleet sunk in the Arabian Gulf by cruise missiles and swarming suicide attacks by "Iranians".( until the Admiral in charge wouldn't accept the tactics and changed the rules)
His proposition was that Aircraft carriers were among several weapons
systems that had outlived their usefulness due to their vulnerablilty just as Battleships did in WW2.
Regards Philip A