This is the reason I road tested all cars booked in for road worthies 1st.
After puting them on the hoist and finding bald tyres, worn tie rod ends, movement in ball joints ect. I just didn't have the "guts" to drive them afterwards;)
Cheers.
Printable View
Earlier this year I bought a VQ Statesman off fleabay.
I drove it back from the Gold Coast to Horsham.
When I picked it up the front tyres were badly worn on the shoulders, so I got a pair of decent second hand tyres fitted for the trip. $75 each for 17 inch tyres. As a % that was an extra 10% on the purchase price of the vehicle, just to drive it 2000 km.
I wouldn't have contemplated driving it without buying the tyres, it just isn't worth it.
In my younger years there used to be a car tyre available which had a very aggressive tread suitable for mud use.
People working on building sites or farmers etc would have a pair on the rear especially during winter.
These tyres were named "winter treads"
We often joked when someone had bald tyres we would call them "Summer Treads"
Dave.
I spent $150 on a private show at a "Strip Club" on friday night , may be I should have saved the coins on a good spare for the Rangie .:angel:
Not just cheap old cars either - the other day I noted a BMW four wheel drive, couldn't be more than a couple of years old, if that - two bald front tyres, reasonable tread on the back.
This of course is one of the things that makes annual roadworthiness checks a joke - the most common dangerous unroadworthiness is tyres, and they can easily go from OK to bad in a month - and hands up those who have had mates borrow a set of tyres for roadworthiness?
John
PS - on the other hand, I remember during and just after the war, several layers of canvas showing was not uncommon, as tyres were almost unobtainable.