View Poll Results: What should the punishment be?

Voters
70. You may not vote on this poll
  • Crush the offenders car

    16 22.86%
  • Impound car

    14 20.00%
  • Heaver fines, "no pay no car".

    22 31.43%
  • lengthy prison sentences

    11 15.71%
  • Weekend detention

    14 20.00%
  • Speed limit, bretho Modifications

    11 15.71%
  • Community service, helping victims

    28 40.00%
  • Community service, cleaning up accident sites

    22 31.43%
  • Reparations to victims by offender

    22 31.43%
  • Let the Army use the car for range practices

    19 27.14%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 88

Thread: Punishment for road law breakers????

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    N Qld,
    Posts
    702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If hoons get their cars impounded for first time offenders.
    The law should include repeat drunk drivers

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Vic, Melbourne, Bayswater North
    Posts
    255
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Depends what law is broken.

    If someone kills someone on the road, it's not 'just another car accident'.

    If someone speeds and ends up killing anyone other than themselves, I want to see them to time in a cell. And not just a few months time either, serious time.

    Same if they are drunk or drugged.

    You end someone's life, you should be locked up for the rest of yours.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Geelong Victoria
    Posts
    940
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprint View Post
    before i vote..... if you want to punish people for speeding, whats the fine for travelling well under the posted speed limit without a valid reason?
    It depends on the circumstances. I was once travelling at about 40 - 50 kmh in a 11o kmh zone in WA in a blinding rainstorm when a Valiant went past me at what must have been close to 110 kmh. He could not have had much more than a rough guess at where he was going. So who was dangerous?

    Willem

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    2,278
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by willem View Post
    It depends on the circumstances. I was once travelling at about 40 - 50 kmh in a 11o kmh zone in WA in a blinding rainstorm when a Valiant went past me at what must have been close to 110 kmh. He could not have had much more than a rough guess at where he was going. So who was dangerous?

    Willem
    I have seen signs in one or two places that say "100km/hr, it's a limit not a target".

    Safe driving obviously means driving to the conditions (traffic, weather,...) and being courteous of others. There really needs to be two limits a top and a bottom and of course in enforcing the bottom there needs to be latitude by officers. Here, on this side of the ditch, officers can ticket someone for driving too slow, especially of they are creating a traffic hazard.

    Alan
    Alan
    2005 Disco 2 HSE
    1983 Series III Stage 1 V8

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Geelong Victoria
    Posts
    940
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Fender View Post
    Depends what law is broken.

    If someone kills someone on the road, it's not 'just another car accident'.

    If someone speeds and ends up killing anyone other than themselves, I want to see them to time in a cell. And not just a few months time either, serious time.

    Same if they are drunk or drugged.

    You end someone's life, you should be locked up for the rest of yours.
    I reckon prison sentences (in most cases) are a mistake ... but finding an effective alternative is not easy!

    Why? because prison sentences just put people into a context of lots of criminals and others where they often they learn criminal conduct. So prisons become schools for criminals ... at taxpayers' expense! Its also a cruel form of punishment.

    There should be just, and severe if necessary, punishment for wrongdoers. I just reckon prison is a lousy way of doing it, where nobody benefits. Not the victims, not society, not the taxpayers, and not the offenders.

    Prisons should only be used for remand centres, and for prisoners who are simply too dangerous to release.

    Willem

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Central Queensland
    Posts
    3,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by willem View Post
    It depends on the circumstances. I was once travelling at about 40 - 50 kmh in a 11o kmh zone in WA in a blinding rainstorm when a Valiant went past me at what must have been close to 110 kmh. He could not have had much more than a rough guess at where he was going. So who was dangerous?

    Willem
    as i said...... without a valid reason.....

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sunny Pucka
    Posts
    3,138
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What do you all recon of this way then...

    Inside America's toughest jail:Tent City, Arizona

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sprint View Post
    as i said...... without a valid reason.....
    Like the Mongol who I followed back to Ocean Grove tonight, I was car 8 in a 14 car convoy following this spastic at 60km/hr in a 100 zone, 2 erratic overtaking people didn;t seem to give the hint, why don;t these idiots look behind and realise, oh that stream of cars would like to get past me and pull over, some people think its there right that they are travelling "fast enough" in there terms and others should follow suit, assholes

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I said care for victims as I think that would slow up a decent person.

    However IMHO throwing the book at people who exceed arbitrarily set speed limits by a few K is entirely about making money, not road safety.

    If you want to save real lives I could come up with a number of options that have been proven to work, but are costly. Brainwashing the public and then booking them on mass is revenue positive and gives people a nice warm feeling that they are doing something.

    Speed doesn't kill - inappropriate speed for the conditions can be dangerous though.
     2005 Defender 110 

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Fender View Post
    Depends what law is broken.

    If someone kills someone on the road, it's not 'just another car accident'.
    So when I didn't know I had epilepsy, had an accident and ran off the road and hit someone I should have ended up in jail? I didn't kill anyone but went damn near close.

    Long version.

    Ran off M2 heading west just after the toll plaza where it kinks left then right. Passed out due to seizure) and didn't turn right ran straight into the back of two cyclists. Now 2 years earlier I had another pedestrian run out in front of me and he was hit. He admitted so in courts and I lost license for 12mths. I had family doctor of 35+ years, 3 neurologists and RTA medicine and driving specialists all say that I couldn't have known that it would happen and I didn't have a history.

    1 year and $50-K in lawyers later I am still guilty of dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm, which while I couldn't have known it would happen I did hit them and do considerable damage. Fortunately it was in a "between rover" phase or they'd defiantly be 6' under. What I really objected to was them trying to get me for 16 counts of "obtain benefit by deception (legal speak for fraud) because I didn't tick the box on my previous license applications stating I had a history of blackouts, seizures and fits.One count per application I had put in over the years. The judge decided that was too much and brought it down to one.

    So end result, 2 year good behavior bond, 2 years (200 hours in the end) community service and 3 years no license. AND to boot I could no longer qualify to keep my job as a commercial diver as I couldn't pass the medical required to do the course, let alone the annual medical required to keep the certification. So there went my quite considerable income and only real qualification.


    Sp please consider that while there are those who do do the wrong thing. The law exists to lay blame on someone. There isn't a provision for something being an "accident"

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!