Hi Terry,
I have owned 4 Discoveries and 3 Range Rovers in the past 20 years. I got my last Disco confused with my second last car. My last Disco (D3) was petrol 6 cylinder (not V8) with smaller brakes. I had 17 inch Land Rover D3 rims fitted with BFG Mud Terrains. My previous Disco (2 vehicles ago) was a D2 V8. Sorry for the confusion. My understanding is that D3 and or D4 (3lt or v8) have bigger brakes and wont take 17 inch rims.
Cheers,
Matt
Interesting data on those Dyno plots when you compare them with the original Factory specs.! Only got 638nm max , not quite the 750-800 some may think possible
Blame it all on the Parasitics !!!
![]()
Excuse what may be a silly question, as I do not know about such things. On a normal rolling road, the statistics are taken from the wheels. I thought that to get engine stats eg kw at the flywheel a special dyno is used where the engine itself is mounted in the dyno - so were the above figures taken from rolling road figures and then calculations done or were engines removed from cars and put on an engine dyno.
Sorry if this is a silly question - as I said I do not know about these things.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
I'm going on the dyno on Monday, so i will ask the question Garry.
Should be interesting results!
Dorko
Every chips/ tune AND Car will be different, just look at Steinbaurer example.
http://www.steinbauer.cc/neu/pdf///S...6_180_kW_1.pdf
Don't read to much into the numbers, any one that has had a custom tune or even a plug in tune will say it feels better in smooth power and 'perhaps' fuel economy.
Saying that, I moved around my calendar and booked in the dyno for Monday just for you... lets hope the results aren't in my head...
Dorko
Thats good Dorko , do you know the Brand of Rolling road he uses .?
Make sure he plots RPM against HP , as road speed will be useless . I seriously doubt whether they will be able to produce any meaningful Torque curve due to the mass of variables .At least find out what the "Ramp rate" was . (Allowed acceleration in RPM/Second) Make sure you record what gear , what range , Tyre pressures , Standard and corrected Air ,Converter locked ,and if he make any allowance for both engine and / or drivetrain Parasitics. If only yours was a manual , it would be so much more accurate .
This is why GarryCol's question is so pertinent !! Engine Dyno or rolling road dyno ?
PS , Steinbauers graph for torque on the 3 Litre is purely a fudged mockup . a schoolkid can see that they have just added a standard deviation to the original torque curve , a well educated guess !!
(Whats 120% of 180 KW ?, well its 216 KW ! Whats 120% of 600NM ? , well its 720NM) Now aint that a coincidence , Power and torque improves at exactly the same rate !!!! Yeah ? BS !!!
My new maps seem to work well. done roughly 100km now so i guess its adapting. Definetly more power and torque, and barely a hint of fuel smoke on full blooded launch off the mark
Forgive me for sounding like a dumb arse, but if a dyno test is done before and after a chip or re-map, shouldn't the improvement be measured by percentage and then related to all circumstances?
Cheers, Craig
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks