Page 10 of 24 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 238

Thread: Performance chips> Are they worth the money???

  1. #91
    mattbuzz77 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by TerryO View Post
    Hi Matt,

    A query if you don't mind, I was of the understanding after reading a number of comments on here that 17's wouldn't fit on a V8 D3 because of the bigger brake size compared to TDV6's D3's.

    cheers,
    Terry
    Hi Terry,
    I have owned 4 Discoveries and 3 Range Rovers in the past 20 years. I got my last Disco confused with my second last car. My last Disco (D3) was petrol 6 cylinder (not V8) with smaller brakes. I had 17 inch Land Rover D3 rims fitted with BFG Mud Terrains. My previous Disco (2 vehicles ago) was a D2 V8. Sorry for the confusion. My understanding is that D3 and or D4 (3lt or v8) have bigger brakes and wont take 17 inch rims.
    Cheers,
    Matt

  2. #92
    mattbuzz77 Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by CaverD3 View Post
    As said earlier bluefin ddo have a handheld mapping module for the 2.7L D4.

    Superchips - Superchips optimise the performance of your car, helping to maximise your driving pleasure.

    Interesting last time I looked the 3.0L wasn't htere but the there was a separate choice for the 2.7L D4. Maybe the same hand held module does both. You will need to check.

    Powrr curve, 2.7L:
    http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/landrovertdv6.pdf


    Power curve 3.0L (needs to be done by the dealer):
    http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/RR30TDV6.pdf
    Cheers CaverD3.
    Matt

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newman WA
    Posts
    889
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interesting data on those Dyno plots when you compare them with the original Factory specs.! Only got 638nm max , not quite the 750-800 some may think possible
    Blame it all on the Parasitics !!!


  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 400HPONGAS View Post
    Interesting data on those Dyno plots when you compare them with the original Factory specs.! Only got 638nm max , not quite the 750-800 some may think possible
    Blame it all on the Parasitics !!!

    Excuse what may be a silly question, as I do not know about such things. On a normal rolling road, the statistics are taken from the wheels. I thought that to get engine stats eg kw at the flywheel a special dyno is used where the engine itself is mounted in the dyno - so were the above figures taken from rolling road figures and then calculations done or were engines removed from cars and put on an engine dyno.

    Sorry if this is a silly question - as I said I do not know about these things.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm going on the dyno on Monday, so i will ask the question Garry.

    Should be interesting results!

    Dorko

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 400HPONGAS View Post
    Interesting data on those Dyno plots when you compare them with the original Factory specs.! Only got 638nm max , not quite the 750-800 some may think possible
    Blame it all on the Parasitics !!!

    Every chips/ tune AND Car will be different, just look at Steinbaurer example.

    http://www.steinbauer.cc/neu/pdf///S...6_180_kW_1.pdf

    Don't read to much into the numbers, any one that has had a custom tune or even a plug in tune will say it feels better in smooth power and 'perhaps' fuel economy.

    Saying that, I moved around my calendar and booked in the dyno for Monday just for you ... lets hope the results aren't in my head...

    Dorko

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Newman WA
    Posts
    889
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thats good Dorko , do you know the Brand of Rolling road he uses .?
    Make sure he plots RPM against HP , as road speed will be useless . I seriously doubt whether they will be able to produce any meaningful Torque curve due to the mass of variables .At least find out what the "Ramp rate" was . (Allowed acceleration in RPM/Second) Make sure you record what gear , what range , Tyre pressures , Standard and corrected Air ,Converter locked ,and if he make any allowance for both engine and / or drivetrain Parasitics. If only yours was a manual , it would be so much more accurate .
    This is why GarryCol's question is so pertinent !! Engine Dyno or rolling road dyno ?
    PS , Steinbauers graph for torque on the 3 Litre is purely a fudged mockup . a schoolkid can see that they have just added a standard deviation to the original torque curve , a well educated guess !!
    (Whats 120% of 180 KW ?, well its 216 KW ! Whats 120% of 600NM ? , well its 720NM) Now aint that a coincidence , Power and torque improves at exactly the same rate !!!! Yeah ? BS !!!

  8. #98
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dandenong ranges
    Posts
    88
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My new maps seem to work well. done roughly 100km now so i guess its adapting. Definetly more power and torque, and barely a hint of fuel smoke on full blooded launch off the mark

  9. #99
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Dandenong ranges
    Posts
    88
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Excuse what may be a silly question, as I do not know about such things. On a normal rolling road, the statistics are taken from the wheels. I thought that to get engine stats eg kw at the flywheel a special dyno is used where the engine itself is mounted in the dyno - so were the above figures taken from rolling road figures and then calculations done or were engines removed from cars and put on an engine dyno.

    Sorry if this is a silly question - as I said I do not know about these things.

    Garry
    Hey there.

    In the UK on dyno's they calculate a flywheel figure off a calcualted dyno loss figure. Im not sure how they come to the % loss figure thou.

    It would be good if they used rear wheel figures like the rest of the world thou

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Mount Martha
    Posts
    1,399
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Forgive me for sounding like a dumb arse, but if a dyno test is done before and after a chip or re-map, shouldn't the improvement be measured by percentage and then related to all circumstances?
    Cheers, Craig

Page 10 of 24 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!