Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 891011 LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 102

Thread: Towing larg(er) caravans

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    1,086
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr smokey View Post
    I need some convincing as to why I should go the D4. The GVM upgrade is going to cost me a few $$$ I suspect as it just won't cut the mustard to carry the basic load. Then there is the WDH and....
    Any constructive thoughts would be appreciated.
    I would say if you need a forum to to help you make a choice then you are in a world of hurt. Of course you are going to get the buy a D4 form this forum just as much as the buy a LC200 from LCOOL.

    Both have good and bad points. One huge plus with the D4 is no need for a WDH some would say this is a negative but I can assure its not. On the downside from the factory the D4 doesn't have enough fuel capacity to tow a big van any distance. The tow hitch setup is average but servicable. All these things can be fixed. With the LC200 it has decent fuel capacity but you need a WDH and with big vans a GVM upgrade because of its limitations. One thing you cant fix is it drives like a barge.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Melb eastern suburbs
    Posts
    80
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Appreciate the comments. Don't particularly like the look of the LC but it has a tad more space in the rear once the seats are removed. It's more in the area of the capabilities of the suspension to cope with the particular van instead of having to HAVE do an immediate upgrade. I am aware that a WDH is not required & use of same will negate warranty etc. Fuel use (apart from range) is not a major issue - you drive it, you fill it up although of course less use is more better.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,034
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr smokey View Post
    I am aware that a WDH is not required & use of same will negate warranty
    I question this as the owners manual only states that the use of a WDH is not recommended.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Melb eastern suburbs
    Posts
    80
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    I question this as the owners manual only states that the use of a WDH is not recommended.
    Graeme, I think that may open a can of worms. It seems on most forums I visit while researching for info, the one issue that provides the most debate (apart from my 4wd is better than your 4wd) is the issue of WDH's. Consensus seems to be that with LR they cause more problems, are not necessary and void warranties ? BUT, I am by NO means an expert and I am sure there will be some "healthy debate" on the matter from others

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    79
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I tow a 23ft van tare 2255 ATM 2655 & it tows beautifully. I have a MY11 SE SDV6 3.0 ltr & get between 15 & 16 l/100 when towing at the posted speed limit. There is a picture of my car and van on the last page of show us your Disco/Sport. I also like being able to just raise it to off road hight when the drawbar is too low to get the jockey wheel on. In the end it's a matter of what features of whatever car suit you the best, for me it was the D4.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr smokey View Post
    Appreciate the comments. Don't particularly like the look of the LC but it has a tad more space in the rear once the seats are removed. It's more in the area of the capabilities of the suspension to cope with the particular van instead of having to HAVE do an immediate upgrade. I am aware that a WDH is not required & use of same will negate warranty etc. Fuel use (apart from range) is not a major issue - you drive it, you fill it up although of course less use is more better.
    I would question this also, I'm pretty sure the D4 has more load space in the rear cargo area and even more once the rear 3rd row seats are out.

    We were in your position also, did a lot of research of the differences, as it happened we got a good deal that we couldn't pass up and the D4 was chosen, the car is amazing.

    Personally I don't you would regret buying either car, as has been said they both have there good and bad points.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    1,086
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr smokey View Post
    Graeme, I think that may open a can of worms. It seems on most forums I visit while researching for info, the one issue that provides the most debate (apart from my 4wd is better than your 4wd) is the issue of WDH's. Consensus seems to be that with LR they cause more problems, are not necessary and void warranties ? BUT, I am by NO means an expert and I am sure there will be some "healthy debate" on the matter from others
    The WDH thing is only a can of worms for people who cant accept that advancements in design can do away with the limitations imposed by a WDH. I have 10's of thousands of KLM's travelled with a large heavy van with no issues at all.

  8. #98
    Rockylizard Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mowog View Post
    The WDH thing is only a can of worms for people who cant accept that advancements in design can do away with the limitations imposed by a WDH. I have 10's of thousands of KLM's travelled with a large heavy van with no issues at all.
    Gday...

    Ditto to above - I have 2006 D3 TDV6 SE Auto - bought with 72,000km on clock, now has 152,000km. I travel full-time towing a 23ft tandem van @ 2,600kg over scales.

    Of the 80,000km the D3 has done the van has done at least 70,000km behind the D3. I do not use a WDH, but did use one when I had a 100 Series Cruiser.

    The D3 completely outshines the 100 Series I had previously in every aspect. I tow at 1,900rpm/2,100rpm in D and let the autobox sort out which gear it needs. It chooses 5th gear 95% of the time which equates to 85-90kph. On hills I just maintain between 2,100-2,700rpm and let the box decide again.

    I maintain a spreadsheet (actual litres/actual Km) and have averaged 14.2ltr/100km for the 80,000km - best without van 8.1ltr (cruising @ 110kph - mainly 6th gear) and worst with van 16.9ltr/100km (pushing into easterly from Normanton to Mount Surprise). With van is usually between 13.5-15.1ltrr/100km depending on conditions.

    For driving and towing the D3 excels over all others - and 200 Series (cumbersome and bulky) is nowhere near as good as a Disco off-road.

    It is always personal choice as with any purchase - but the myth that "everyone knows the Toyota" and "they have the biggest dealer network" are just that myths. A problem with a 200 Series, outside normal servicing, will be as difficult (or more so) to get parts and knowledgeable technical assistance as the Discovery. I have met many waiting for parts for upto two weeks away from major cities. Example - Rockhampton, 200 Series needed a replacement waterpump, had to wait for shipping from Sydney. None in Rocky, none in Brisvegas.

    My liddle Landy has yet to stop on on the road. Very reliable unit (hope that bloke Murphy ain't readin ' this )

    I rest my case.

    Cheers - John

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Melb eastern suburbs
    Posts
    80
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mowog View Post
    I would say if you need a forum to to help you make a choice then you are in a world of hurt. Of course you are going to get the buy a D4 form this forum just as much as the buy a LC200 from LCOOL.
    G'day Mowog, I have followed your posts elsewhere with interest especially the suspension upgrade on your van. I am certainly not anticipating making a decision wholly based on forum advice and the final choice will more than likely come down to a) bum on seat feel and b) approval from the Chancellor of the Exchequer

    Whilst I anticipated a tendency towards bias on both forums, there has been a swag of new info for me to digest on both forums (where I asked a similar question) not knowing much about either marque and how they would suit my purposes.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    3,775
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Seriously why not just go drive both of them? That will be the biggest test either vehicle has to pass.

    Both are great tugs, both have heaps of power, both (now)have similar reliability, both cost round the same. However they are two very different vehicles to drive, so chances are you will like either one or the other.
    Cheers,
    Terry

    D1 V8 (Gone)
    D2a HSE V8 (Gone)
    D3 HSE TDV6 (Unfortunately Gone)
    D4 V8

Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ... 891011 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!