Printable View
We have RRS because with two of us it is right size. Disco undeniably bigger but if you don't need space then RRS better for everyday use. Re taking them bush, yes in a heartbeat. But, if going remote would take GAPS IDD tool or scanguage. And I reckon if really serious Gordon's 18" rims. Then enjoy the trip. Sorry but I think defers are over rated they still have faults that have been known for years so frankly think newer D3/4/RRS are better IMO
Last year we did a trip from here down to Flinders ranges,then up to Alice,through Finke,Mt Dare,Simpson desert,and back to Brisbane,no problems at all.Did the same trip in 04 in the D2a,also not a problem.
One place i probably wouldn't take the D4 is the Tele track on the Cape.i have done it twice up and back in the D2a,no trouble at all.
But with the D4,the concern would be water in the electrics.Some of the creek crossings are at times very deep,over bonnet level.
Others would probably disagree,each to their own,or if you are keen,set the vehicle up as well as possible,and have a go.Make sure you go late in the season,so the water levels are as low as possible,but by then the tracks may be badly chopped up.
Yes with young kids we could use the space of the Disco but my wife needs something that reliably fits in city car parks etc so RRS we have and I'm looking at decent touring trailers.
I have to say the 2010 TDV8 is IMO a flawed classic, my wife and I are rather in love with it for different reasons despite its foibles.
Sent from my C6903 using AULRO mobile app
Watch this, if anyone has any doubts after watching this, then buy a Toyota.
[ame]https://youtu.be/clVX1LevLUs[/ame]
Baz.
I'm bemused by people saying they buy the RRS for city work and parking. They are the same width. The difference in length is 48mm ... less than 2". According to published specs. Wheelbase is very different - 140mm. Almost 6". But turning circle is much the same: 11.45 m v RRS 11.49 m.
For shopping, the rear access of both vehicles have advantages and disadvantages - but for a shop big enough to benefit from flat loading, the twin doors of the Disco takes up less room behind the vehicle compared to the pop out door of the RRS.
If the Disco is too bulky for city parking etc., then don't imagine the RRS is more compact. Its much the same.
Mate of mine just did a whirlwind trip through woop woop ... can't remember all the details but Big Red was in there. I didn't go 'cause they were just covering too much territory too quickly for my liking.
Mixed bunch of vehicles including his D4 HSE with 19" rims. He's running some sort of Cooper AT I think though. Definitely not LTZ.
He said the only noteworthy, vehicle related issue was him making it up Big Red first time and the non-LRs having to have a few goes. :)
No reliability issues or tyre problems to report.
Discovery 3 tdv6 2005 @ 240K.
Just put it through a week of torture in the Pilbara WA.
Rock climbing, loose gravel, water crossings, dust, sand, plenty of bush-stripes...the works! Plus 1000K to and fro on black-top at up to 110km/hr (more with overtaking.)
I returned home gob-smacked by the vehicles performance. I am a careful but at times too adventurous driver off road, and almost came unstuck on a 45 degree downhill track with enormous washouts. I was literally stuck between a rock and a hard place! The disco reversed me out of trouble.
I found the rock crawl function particularly impressive, and had fun playing with the various switch functions for various conditions.
The highway trip was luxury, with quick overtaking of road trains making for a safer trip.
Outback travel? No probs, with the usual mechanical, maintainance, navigational, communications, and spares preparations.
-Wasa
One D4 covered the Gibb River Road and the road to Bungle Bungles before taking on the Canning Stock Route. The other covered the Gun Barrel Hyw and the Tanami Track before also taking on the Canning Stock Route.Quote:
Originally Posted by discotwinturbo
After several thousand k's on badly corrugated outback roads and tracks both returned unscathed though suspension error faults were encountered on both and dealt with along the way.
The 200 series was flawless but covered far less distance staying only on bitumen before doing the CSR. The mitsi ... sadly, that's another story.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferret
What kind of faults? Actual problems or just sensor issues?
Scott
PS .... Those are trips I'd love to do in mine in coming years.
Suspension errors were algorithmic errors though they do point to underlying mechanical wear issues which if left would probably progress to outright failure at some point in time.
One D4 resolved its issues by changing lower control arms in a 1-2 day layover after finishing the Tanami and starting the CSR. No further suspension faults arose on this vehicle after this.
The prospect of lower control arm bush wear was anticipated given the k's on this vehicle and the parts were purchased prior to leaving Perth and so made available at short notice when needed.
The other began to raise the odd suspension fault in the last 3-4 days on the CSR. The exact cause is yet to be determined but must involve an air leak or dodgy height sensor. Errors were just cleared and progress continued without hindrance except for a saggy arse on 2-3 mornings which rose again on starting the engine. Aside from the morning saggy arse no functionality was lost once the engine was running.
A spare height sensor was carried but there was never any need to fit.