Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 57 of 57

Thread: My D4's Reliability (or lack thereof)

  1. #51
    Mudrunner Guest
    Mmmm smells like citrus to me!
    My 2010 D4 has been superb for 52,000k. Apart from 2 cracked windscreens, I can't complain.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    If the vehicles have a good build and have a low failure rate recovering the odd one in the middle of nowhere is hardly going to break the manufacturers bank . I am not talking getting bogged I am talking things like engine failure. I can see why Ferrari or alfa isn't going to be paying to get your car if it breaks down on a beach at moreton island or Fraser hut I cant for the life of me see why if we want to use our genuine OFFROADER (wait for it...) OFFROAD breakdown (not 'bogdown') should not extend to that.

    Cheers
    Are you really entirely missing my point, or just playing about? If you have ANY form of breakdown (bogged, engine, tyre, whatever) and you're on an isolated 4WD track, how is a tow-truck going to get to you?? Even if it's a 4WD truck, how can the operators guarantee that they'll be able to go where you've gone (and if you're driving a D4, that could be pretty out-there!!). Your thinking of only one situation - beach driving.

    And note that the individual recovery crews would need to be certified for 4WD operations. Short of a Chinook, it's not feasible to extend free guaranteed recovery to 4WD situations. No manufacturer offers that service for free - why do you think LR should?

    It's not the individual recoveries that would cost a company. It's the maintaining of the infrastructure such that you could guarantee it. For example, you can't have a single 4WD recovery crew "just in case" - suppose there are two recoveries required at the same time on opposite sides of the country? Your guarantee to recover would be expected to cover both of them.

    From there, it doesn't take much cognitive effort to see that the argument extends to "x" number of 4WD recovery crews, until x is quite a sizeable number. So it's immaterial whether you're talking of one or hundreds of recoveries.

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,201
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The policy only covers 60km of free towing anyway, so its no skin off their bottom line where you are distance-wise...
    I guess for starters recovery/remobilising due to bogging or mech failure, and actually towing/flatbedding out of remote country are different prospects.
    I still don't know how Deano could have avoided calling the cavalry, and he was hardly out the back of Rudall NP...
    Now 2016 D4 HSE 'Leo' and Steve the Triumph Speed Twin
    Then 2010 D4 3.0 HSE 'James'
    Then 2010 RRS TDV8 'Roger' w traxide DBS, UHF, Cooper Zeons, Superchips remap
    Then 2010 D4 TDV6 'Jumbo' w traxide DBS
    First love 2002 D2 TD5 'Disco Stu'

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Again, no infrastructure necessary - they already contract to RACQ etc who have 4wd breakdown contractors. My argument is not confined to LR. You can cut it 3 ways from Sunday, but they should have assisted him at Moreton. Cheers


    Ps

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Again, no infrastructure necessary - they already contract to RACQ etc who have 4wd breakdown contractors. My argument is not confined to LR. You can cut it 3 ways from Sunday, but they should have assisted him at Moreton. Cheers


    Ps
    In what locations do RAC (Q, WA, SA etc) have 4WD breakdown contractors? And do RACQ provide this service for free? If so, then yes, you can argue that LRA could avail themselves of it, if the breakdown occurs in the stated covered areas.

    If you can't be bothered reading the fine print, or just for peace of mind, ask Roadside Assist if they'll recover you BEFORE you head out to a particular area! Just like asking what's covered with any insurance policy. No point crying foul after the event - it rarely gets you anywhere.

    How many people have actually read the assist policy? If you're going to depend upon it, don't you think you should?

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No they are no free - RACQ charges LR for the tow, using approved contractors in remote areas, just like they charge back to LR for tarmac breakdowns - both the patrol that might attend and get the vehicle going (less and less likely these days) and tow trucks. Gone are the days of the average bod solving an off road breakdown themselves - vehicle are just so complex and often even the experts with all the gear have problems. I have expressed my opinion and dont think I can add to it. What I do know is that I would be bitterly annoyed and disappointed if I had spent some serious coin on a new Toyota, LR etc and took it over to Moreton (again hardly the arse end of the world) and it chucked a wobbly on the Western beach and (despite that you can see the skyscrapers of Brisbane) I was told sorry you are on your own until its back in 2wd territory.

    Anyway, thats me done for this debate because clearly there will be differences of opinion about what the backup for a genuine 4wd vehicle should be.

    Cheers

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    No they are no free - RACQ charges LR for the tow, using approved contractors in remote areas,

    Cheers
    Sorry, what I meant was - is the RACQ 4WD recovery free to RACQ members, or is there a premium paid for this service (implying that LRA would have to pay a premium to use it)? If it's free in this sense, AND it's within the LRA recovery area as defined in the policy, then I'd have to agree that there seems no reason why LRA shouldn't use the service.

    Otherwise, well its a free service voluntarily provided by LRA so there isn't really a basis for arguing on whether it's suitable or not - "gifthorse" and "mouth" come to mind.

    I have the RAC roadside assist, as well as my free LRA one - never used RAC, but I doubt it would give me any more coverage than LRA, and I have to pay for it!

    The WAULRO'ians have compiled an emergency contact list of LR owners around WA who are willing to help out a stranded LR owner (PM LandyAndy if you want a copy of the list). I don't know if any of the other state groups have this, but's it's something worth looking into.

    Cheers,

    Gordon

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!