Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: What size tyres people running on 17' rims

  1. #21
    kenthead Guest
    I run 265/70 17's Cooper s/t maxx on factory rims. never had an issue with them rubbing at any height. I don't have rear a/c and never had a seam rolled or folded. I was originally told that they wouldn't fit but i'm on my second set now. Previous set lasted 90,000+ kms.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    12
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kenthead View Post
    I run 265/70 17's Cooper s/t maxx on factory rims. never had an issue with them rubbing at any height. I don't have rear a/c and never had a seam rolled or folded. I was originally told that they wouldn't fit but i'm on my second set now. Previous set lasted 90,000+ kms.
    Sweet, that's awesome news, was the size I was hoping would work with.

  3. #23
    Ean Austral Guest
    If some are saying that 265/70/17 rub and some aren't, would it be as simple as the tyres that rub are M/T with the more chunky tread or the tread blocks on the shoulder rubbing and the less aggressive A/T not rubbing ?


    Just a simple thought.


    Cheers Ean

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ean Austral View Post
    If some are saying that 265/70/17 rub and some aren't, would it be as simple as the tyres that rub are M/T with the more chunky tread or the tread blocks on the shoulder rubbing and the less aggressive A/T not rubbing ?


    Just a simple thought.


    Cheers Ean
    This could be the case Ean, also, just because the size says 265, this doesn't mean that the acual width is 265, it depends on where the manufacturer measures the tyre from, some are measured from the edge, whereas some are measured from down the shoudler.

    As an excample, our 255/60/18s were actually physically wider than the 265/70/17s when you put them side by side, because our 255 GG AT2s were measured from the tyres edge and the 265 Kumhos were measured from down the shoulder.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  5. #25
    Ean Austral Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Redback View Post
    This could be the case Ean, also, just because the size says 265, this doesn't mean that the acual width is 265, it depends on where the manufacturer measures the tyre from, some are measured from the edge, whereas some are measured from down the shoudler.

    As an excample, our 255/60/18s were actually physically wider than the 265/70/17s when you put them side by side, because our 255 GG AT2s were measured from the tyres edge and the 265 Kumhos were measured from down the shoulder.

    Baz.

    Yep the same with the OEM wranglers at 255 are wider than the Dunlop 265 I have on at the moment.




    Cheers Ean

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,874
    Total Downloaded
    0
    But more to the point on the rears it's overall diameter that causes the rubbing, width to a lesser extent.
    On the front width also matters more.
    2014 SDV6 HSE - LLAMS, Tuff Ant Tree Sliders, Tuff Ant 18" rims, Nitto Ridge Grappler tyres 265/65 R18, Custom Lipo4 battery, Custom Drawer storage system https://www.box.com/s/jem0ilac3cner2mexq64

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    12
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I may be wrong, but was under the impression that all tires were measured from the widest point, ie if the side wall bulges wider than the tread width etc.
    yeh i know a different width rim can influence that, but the specified rim the manufacturer of tire stipulates is designed for.
    Interesting comment re tread style.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,033
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've always understood that the metric width size specification is the nominal section width in mm on the tyre manufacturer's nominated width rim.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This will answer a few tyre questions.

    Hours of reading…….


    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...#39;techid=202

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    12
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    I've always understood that the metric width size specification is the nominal section width in mm on the tyre manufacturer's nominated width rim.
    Hey Greame, I was just going off of what a mate who owns a tyre store told me, as i'd thought the same as you till I measured a few tyres and they measured narrower than the size they were.
    Ps, I have been kown to be wrong before. lol, no seriously I have,

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!