I understand why Graeme but I'd still like to see that ;)
Scott
Printable View
Graeme's 275/55 R20 tyres look very similar to my 285/60 R18 BFG tyres. They look smaller than the same size D697's but I think it is because of the full width square looking tread. The D697 is a more conventional tyre with a more bulging sidewall that comes out past the edge of the tread, which seems to make them look wider. I'm very interested to see what they do at 18psi. The D697 rear tyres look almost flat at 18, although the fronts are fine. They are great in soft sand at that pressure, however.
Aarron,its only a small increase in sidewall height compared to our stockies.What concerns me is they are wider,I believe half our problem is the tyres are quite wide and need to push a fair amount of sand before you move,we have little sidewall bagging out to assist.
Andrew
Bob, do you use the same pressure in the rear as the front when loaded, particularly regarding sand usage? I used 4 psi less in the front to obtain about the same footprint in sand with my loaded D4.
Greame.
When Aaron and I were at Horrocks we couldnt get the D4s to do much at all with anything above 15psi.
We both were disgusted,as we and our friend who just got his new deefer last week(was a D2 owner) as too the very poor performance in the soft sand and all agreed our D2s wouldnt have struggled.I do believe the sand was much softer than where the 3 of us normally beach drive.I never used to air down in the D2 until it was struggling.
Once we were moving the soft sand was easy.It was just the trying to get moving that was the issue.
The Toyotas didnt need to make a runway like I did on our last fish.Aaron gave up in disgust and parked on terra firma.
The 19"tyres are the worst feature of these loverley vehicles:(:(:(:(:(:(
Andrew
FWIW I've done a lot of soft sand driving now in a RRV on 285/50/20 Cooper LTZ and never looked like getting stuck, but aired down from scratch to 16psi.
Cheers