Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: 2.7 fuel filter flow rate ??

  1. #1
    Ean Austral Guest

    2.7 fuel filter flow rate ??

    Gday All,


    I have just checked the workshop disc I have and it has the info for the 4.0 & the 4.4 but nothing about the 2.7 diesel filter flow rate.


    Can anyone tell me what the flow rate needs to be for a fuel filter on the 2.7 please.


    thanks in Advance.


    Cheers Ean

  2. #2
    Narangga's Avatar
    Narangga is offline TopicToaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    McMinns Lagoon NT
    Posts
    4,531
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm no help Ean. I've even spent some time trying to find out (via internet) what the flow rate is on various manufacturer's filters are but no one gives away any secrets. Maybe we're not supposed to know...
    Cheers, Dale
    PIC - It comes with the Territory

    'The D3' - 2006 TDV6 HSE
    2008 Kimberley Kamper Sports RV
    Previously Enjoyed:
    2002 Adventure Offroad Campers 'Cape York'
    2000 D2 Td5 - plus!
    1997 Defender 110 Wagon - fully carpeted

  3. #3
    Ean Austral Guest
    Oh well thanks anyway , I guess the worse figures I have seen are around 22l / 100ks so simple brain tells me add a bit and use 30lts/ hour then add some for return so am guessing a flow rate above 50ltrs / hours should cover it.


    I am looking at putting a proper water trap filter inline so am about to choose the filter and do some measuring for where it will fit. Looking at the size of the existing filter on 2008 model I would be surprised if the flow rate is anywhere near my figures .


    Cheers Ean

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Water traps are exactly that - water traps and usually there is no filter in them - for example - the Water Watch product. Generally speaking any filter that allows fuel through will also allow some water through hence the "trap" method rather than the "filter" method is preferred.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #5
    Ean Austral Guest
    I will re- phrase it . I want to put a better fuel foilter with water trap capabilities that the 1 that is currently there. I am going to leave the existing unit in place just fit another unit inline.

    Cheers Ean

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mandurah WA
    Posts
    659
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ean,
    Check out the current Oil catch can for a D4 post,on the second page Dalil post shows a photo of his setup of a water trap/filter.

  7. #7
    LRD414's Avatar
    LRD414 is offline Super Moderator Subscriber
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,737
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by eddy View Post
    Check out the current Oil catch can for a D4 post,on the second page Dalil post shows a photo of his setup of a water trap/filter.
    Thread link for future reference:
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/l319-disco...-can-d4-2.html



    Regards,
    Scott
    D4 TDV6 MY14 with Llams, Tuffant Wheels, Traxide DBS, APT sliders & protection plates, Prospeed Winch Mount w/ Carbon 12K, Mitch Hitch & Drifta Drawers
    Link to my D4 Build Thread
    D3 2005 V8 Petrol
    Ex '77 RRC 2 door. Long gone but not forgotten.

  8. #8
    Ean Austral Guest
    Thanks Scott,

    I have Sent a PM as I am curious how and where that is plumbed in, it is similar to what I had in mind but L/R use a hard type fuel line with connectors , that is normal rubber fuel hose so I can only assume it comes off the fuel cooler but some more info would be great.

    Cheers Ean

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Water traps are exactly that - water traps and usually there is no filter in them - for example - the Water Watch product. Generally speaking any filter that allows fuel through will also allow some water through hence the "trap" method rather than the "filter" method is preferred.
    Modern diesel filters perform water separation in the filter. Commonrail injectors are much more sensitive to water than old style injectors.

    Old style water traps are pretty crap in terms of separating fine water droplets. Even more so in common rails with the higher fuel recirculation rates and fuel temp.

    I am surprised that the cav type filter above has enough flow for the application. it may not be rated for a high enough temperature either.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Modern diesel filters perform water separation in the filter.
    Yes and no - in the 2.7 fuel filter the water separation process is done inside the fuel filter housing but not specifically by the filter inside it - there is an area at the bottom of the housing where the fuel basically slows down and the water separates out at the bottom (hopefully setting off the alert) and the fuel then goes on into the filter. The problem is the water catchment in the OEM filter is too small and unless acted upon immediately the water can still go through the filter and stuff up the HPFP etc.

    Ean - with the small water watch unit they disconnect the rubber hose that goes into the fuel filter and run fuel hose from their up to a spare mount just in front of the air filter in the engine bay - the small water catchment is installed there and rubber fuel hose then runs from there back to the fuel filter inlet. The large Water Watch is mounted elsewhere but uses the same connections.

    If you are using just water trap that is a good arrangement but if you are going to just use a filter with a finer gauge than the the OEM then ideally that should be mounted downstream from the OEM filter. The logic being that the OEM will catch the larger particles and the new finer filter catches the smaller ones.

    Some people like to mount the finer filter first but this catches everything including the larger stuff and clog up quickly and the OEM is doing nothing but the little water catchment will still work.

    Clearly their are different views on this sequence but people who have mounted the finer filter first in other vehicles being used in dirty conditions have reported the finer filter does clog up quickly.

    My thoughts for what it is worth.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!