I didn't know it takes premium? The engine doesn't need the higher octane as far as i'm aware..
Printable View
FWIW I did a test with my old Pajero a number of years ago comparing E10 to regular unleaded to premium (vortex 95/8 from memory) and found that the fuel consumption was better as you progressed from E10 to Vortex. The performance was noticeably better with the Vortex. Bottom line was that using the premium fuel saved money and the car performed better. Each test ran for 3 months so it was reasonably reliable.
Martin
I test drove a 4ltr d3 on Saturday and one look at the trip computer reading 22-24/100 is enough to put me off a petrol , pity because car was a very clean 07 with low k's and full service history.
Was advertised as a tdv6 which is why I went to look at it but seller stuffed up.
I see 11.5/100 on my D4 3.0TDV6 on the city rat run doing kids school runs. Amazing in comparison
I Never use E10 but i didn't notice any difference between 91/95/98, despite all the branding on the more expensive fuels it's not really necessary to pay extra unless you have a performance car.
This is from the manual:
'Only use Unleaded 95 RON fuel to EN 228specification. Unleaded fuel no lower than 90RON may also be used.'
Just my opinion. I guess we disagree! [biggrin]
Huh! I never saw that in the manual. Will have to check again!
Yeah i remember picking mine up after I'd bought it and the trip computer read 22L/100km. I was in sydney in stop start traffic though.
Up around the coast it averages about 17L/100km, though my wife does a lot of short 5min trips to the shops which dont help economy. The petrols apparently handle these short trips better than the diesels too.
Unless you're towing or touring frequently the petrol is good value [emoji106]