Originally Posted by 
Jpdv
				
			 
			That's fascinating, and I'm grateful for the info.  But you are still proving my point with your own words... If 'Now this is far too long' is applicable to a LR documentation specification (as you state), then we can reasonably question whether they have got their oil recommendation right too, as opposed to your explicit dismissal of the original poster...  
I don't know the answer in either case, but you can't have it both ways - either LR documentation is gospel, or it isn't - you don't get to pick and choose which bits are unarguable in order to suit your opinion. One of the values of a forum like this is fact checking, and asking fair questions.  Dogmatic dismissal doesn't help.