Printable View
What I never got about the smaller brake package with smaller engine thing, is that the two models will still have the same GVM and rated towing capacity. So why the need for larger brakes?Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscoMick
Incidentally has anyone seen payload figures for the D5?
Who said it looked like a Ford Territory?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tombie
Quote:
Originally Posted by garrycol
My apology Garry, I read what you wrote and then somehow shuffled it along in my mind as I searched for pics..
It still looks different enough I think..
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...016/10/310.jpg
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...016/10/311.jpg
To be fair, that's the old Explorer front end. I think he has a point, but the Explorer is a damn fine looking car so that's hardly a bad thing. Half the price, too ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Tombie
Attachment 115441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew86
Whoah, that is close and from a distance I think he's right.
Interesting:
18" wheels only available on 4 cylinder model.
Mainly due to brake calipers.
https://www.4x4australia.com.au/news...-off-road-cred
Here you goQuote:
Originally Posted by Stuart02
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...016/11/352.jpg
The higher payload number is for 7 seat vehicles, lower for 5 seat.
According to the LR specs I just posted, the 2L 4cyl versions have the same brakes, yet SVO say otherwise?Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Rich~
Somewhere i read smaller 4 piston callipers,so rotors may be the same size.(for SVO)Quote:
Originally Posted by Grentarc
Definitely different to the tech specs you posted as they all have identical callipers and rotors,as said.
The SVX ingenium version is not listed there so I assume the above table is correct. When SVO release the SVX specs, I am willing to bet there will be a few changes from the standard version, including the brake package. At least, that's what I read into it....
