Page 47 of 50 FirstFirst ... 374546474849 ... LastLast
Results 461 to 470 of 500

Thread: Discovery 5

  1. #461
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Coolamon, NSW
    Posts
    783
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    Somewhere i read smaller 4 piston callipers,so rotors may be the same size.(for SVO)
    Definitely different to the tech specs you posted as they all have identical callipers and rotors,as said.
    So if we look at it that way, why not put the (hypothetical) SVX 4 pot calipers on the 3.0 and be done with it? Slim 4 pots instead of bulky 2 pot calipers would be my pick anyway. It's actually something I have be looking into (off and on) for my D4 to get a better choice of wheels.
    - Justin
    Selling soon - MY10 D4 3.0 TDV6 SE with E-Diff & LLAMS, 265/65R18 Maxxis Razr A/T
    Moved into MY12 L322 4.4 TDV8 Autobiography
    VK2HFJ

  2. #462
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Williamstown, Victoria
    Posts
    3,244
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Ingenium, more grunt than a TD5

    The Ingenium has more horse power and torque than a TD5! I'd get one of these in a D5 except that they will not supply my colour combinations, (Firenze red with leather seats) in the SE model. I don't have the spare cash for the HSE. Nor the base model.
    D2a Td5 Manual, Chawton White. aka "Daisy"
    Build date 11th Oct 2003
    Freelander 2 2011, manual, the daughter calls it Perri
    Before I had a Land Rover I did not have any torque wrenches. Now I have three.
    LROCV #1410

  3. #463
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,201
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Grentarc View Post
    Here you go



    The higher payload number is for 7 seat vehicles, lower for 5 seat.

    Gee looking at those stats I reckon the SD4 will be a very popular practical compromise if ppl can get past the 2.0l capacity - 1015 kg payload if I'm reading it right, along with 500nm and half a tonne less kerb weight than a D4, and the extra range over the 6 cylinder. It'll be impressive.
    Now 2016 D4 HSE 'Leo' and Steve the Triumph Speed Twin
    Then 2010 D4 3.0 HSE 'James'
    Then 2010 RRS TDV8 'Roger' w traxide DBS, UHF, Cooper Zeons, Superchips remap
    Then 2010 D4 TDV6 'Jumbo' w traxide DBS
    First love 2002 D2 TD5 'Disco Stu'

  4. #464
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    282
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Stuart02 View Post
    Gee looking at those stats I reckon the SD4 will be a very popular practical compromise if ppl can get past the 2.0l capacity - 1015 kg payload if I'm reading it right, along with 500nm and half a tonne less kerb weight than a D4, and the extra range over the 6 cylinder. It'll be impressive.


    Agree looks good on figures but really need to wait and see if does stand up to its potential. Still trying to get my head around how a 4cyl can be better than a 6cyl towing around this size 4WD ( even with the reduced TARE ). I'm trying to keep an open mind till I get to test drive one next year.

  5. #465
    Tombie Guest

    Discovery 5

    Number of cylinders isn't really relevant - big torque 4 cyl are common.

    Agree with Tare being only relevant to urban operating.

    Once loaded to GVM is where the performance needs to be Discovery 5

  6. #466
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The Amorak TDI420 is a 2 litre, 4 cyl with 132 kW, 420nM, weighs 2020 kg and tows 3000kg.

    The D5 is a 100kg heavier so even the poverty pack TD4 should be fine. If not, get the SD4 for showing off and the TD6 for (big) towing.

    Makes sense to me.

    I agree the SD4 seems (on paper) to be the pick. More so if you can option the TD6 bigger tank, although I'm not sure that 8 litres makes a difference in the real world.

  7. #467
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Now if they just (re) made an SD1...

    Cheers

  8. #468
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Garfield View Post
    Agree looks good on figures but really need to wait and see if does stand up to its potential. Still trying to get my head around how a 4cyl can be better than a 6cyl towing around this size 4WD ( even with the reduced TARE ). I'm trying to keep an open mind till I get to test drive one next year.
    Remember when the D1 came out 26 or so years ago,every Tom Dick and Harry expert claimed the 2.5ltr engine was too small,didn't have enough power and they would never last?,498,634km's later mines still going like a train .Time's the great revealer,the D5 will prove to be just the same. Pat

  9. #469
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    here
    Posts
    1,213
    Total Downloaded
    0
    They were right in that the Td5 didn't have enough power Discovery 5

  10. #470
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by catch-22 View Post
    They were right in that the Td5 didn't have enough power Discovery 5


    The TD5 had more than ample power and torque.

    The fact people are buying 3.0 SDV6s and still chasing more just shows mankinds insatiable stupidity.

    Everyone is so impatient now Discovery 5

Page 47 of 50 FirstFirst ... 374546474849 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!