Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: Which engine for towing?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Albury
    Posts
    16
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Which engine for towing?

    This may sound like a stupid question but, given that there is quite a price difference between the SD4 and the TD6, what are people's thoughts on the suitability of the SD4 for pulling a 22ft van with tare 2200kg? (ATM 2700 kg IF 180 litres of water on board).

    I'm guessing that if a 2 litre Amarok has no issues then a SD4 won't either.


    I'd like to get the SD4 and spend the $7k saved on fruit. Cheers.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South West Slopes NSW
    Posts
    30
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Towing.

    To quote a famous saying;
    When it comes to towing.
    "there are no substitute for cubic inches". (or cc)

    All manufacturers including Land Rover are fitting smaller engines which rely on their turbocharging to make power, for many reasons non of which include heavy towing, especially in our climate.
    If you are going to regularly tow more than 2.5t then I would go for the TD6.
    I recently retired my Disco2 TD5 from towing our van and bought a Rangie Sport TDv8 to tow the van which is the same size/weight as yours.

    For what it's worth I have 45 years experience as a heavy Diesel mechanic and own 2 Rovers.
    Cheers.

  3. #3
    discorevy is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,364
    Total Downloaded
    0
    that saying is pretty long in the tooth, technology has come a long way, consider your td5 did the job and even if it was remapped it would fall 100 or so nm below the standard sd4 not to mention the power deficit , the extra 4 gears etc , methinks the sd4 will be fine for the job , if it was constantly towing 3 tonne plus then it might be worth considering the td6 you'll also save a bit on fuel with the sd4 but only when not towing. I tow a 2.2 tonne yacht with my disco3 tdv6 in which i have a tune around the same torque as sd4 but my disco weighs 2.7 tonnes and 6 speed , still plenty :-)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    303
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's all about torque.

    Torque used to be a product of cubic inches, or stroke to be more precise. Designers have tried to replace cubic inches with forced induction, getting the same amount of fuel/ air mix in a smaller chamber.

    Sounds great, doesn't it? But there's no such thing as a free lunch. The more you rely on forced induction to boost torque the more compromises you will make. Heat and turbo lag spring to mind. Don't believe me? Take a V8 Commodore for a test drive (while you can). Feel torque from cubic inches, then drive a turbo with similar torque figures. You will not feel the creamy, smooth torque that only capacity can provide.

    As technology is used to increase output from smaller motors I'm certain reliability comes into the equation. And, on hot days, turbos do not generate anywhere near their potential power. Ever wonder why Euro turbos that have an overboost capability don't have them enabled for the Australian market?

    Don't be misled by the attraction of better fuel economy with a smaller motor. In the real world it doesn't happen. You need x amount of fuel to move a vehicle weighing y at z kmh for w kilometers. A six cylinder Commodore uses about the same a an eight, any difference comes about because we all open the throttle about the same amount to get moving, so the 8 consumes more (but gets to speed quicker). On the open road, with little speed variation, the difference is negligible.

    If I was selecting between motors with towing in mind I'd get the biggest motor using my preferred fuel. It will do the job better, and IMHO for longer. I'd also expect the bigger donk to have a much better resale value...

  5. #5
    discorevy is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,364
    Total Downloaded
    0
    V8 commodore ? OK then
    V8 commodore 1700 kg drag coefficient 0.31 , 6.2 v8 , torque 570 nm , average 12 l / 100
    Discovery 4 2700 kg drag coefficient 0.4. , 3.0 v6 , torque 600 nm , average 10 l / 100
    Wonder what the 6.2,s fuel consumption would be if it was in the disco ?
    I love a v8 petrol as well but they are not efficient and also don't put out as much in the heat , that's just to do with air density, the new generation of Brit and euro diesels are incredibly efficient , modern metallurgy also makes them reliable , sequential turbos deliver the torque smoothly , whichever way you look at it turbo diesel is what you use for hauling stuff and 500 nm is enough for the op's requirements when you consider the 400 + kilos weight reduction on the disco 5

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ranelagh, Tasmania
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't know why they turbo all those truck engines, they just have to make them bigger to get the same torque and fuel efficiency.

    The new ingenium is still an unknown for towing at this stage, it may be very good or it may not be tuned well. I would be waiting for some real world experience or if you can't wait buy the TD6.
    Fuji white RRS L494 AB

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Albury
    Posts
    16
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Geedublya View Post
    I would be waiting for some real world experience or if you can't wait buy the TD6.
    I think this is the answer I needed to be told

    Hopefully some one will tow test it before I need to put my order in.
    Cheers.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Forrestfield WA
    Posts
    1,305
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have the Ingenium 132kW, which is the equivalent of the TD4, in my DS. I certainly wouldn't like it in the heavier D5. The SD4 has a lot more torque on paper so it may be OK.


    Although it is getting better with a few thousand km there is a lot of turbo lag and it seems to lack torque once you build up a few revs. It pulls hard at 2000rpm but then tapers off a lot before the next gear change when accelerating hard, even with the 9 speed transmission.


    The other issue with all the new LR diesels is having to use Add Blue. It must be refilled using a few 1.9l bottles costing $16 a bottle. The only ones I have found are at a dealer. None in any shops that I can find.


    My first refill at about 4500km would have cost $150 but was free for the first fill. I am going to try buying a 1.9l bottle and then refilling from the 20l containers you can buy. According to the manual you can't use the Add Blue pump at the servo, which makes it very inconvenient, compared with say Audi which has a filler located next to the fuel filler to fill up from a servo.

  9. #9
    discorevy is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,364
    Total Downloaded
    0
    DPF = Disabled Performance Filter, what a pain these are , might be worth a chat to Kevin about deleting it after the warranty , Pete Bell should have a software patch for it by then

  10. #10
    DiscoMick Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by discorevy View Post
    DPF = Disabled Performance Filter, what a pain these are , might be worth a chat to Kevin about deleting it after the warranty , Pete Bell should have a software patch for it by then
    That would make your vehicle illegal, like VW's cheat software, which could have registration and insurance implications of it was ever found to be relevant to a claim.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!