Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: New RRS in the flesh

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,563
    Total Downloaded
    0

    New RRS in the flesh

    Who else took a look at the Land Rover expo?

    Very lux, but it reminds me a bit of going to a school reunion and seeing someone who put on 50kg since you last saw them, you can just make out the person you once knew but looks like they swallowed a goat. And not much legroom in the second row.

    Interestingly the main reason I bought a Disco instead of a RRS was that I wanted the 7 seats. Now it has them but I wouldn't buy one.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Hunter Valley
    Posts
    173
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Had a look at it, and my first thought was that there is no way it should be called a seven seater. When the D3 came out it was hailed for the packaging and amount of passenger room it had because of its hydro pressed chassis (correct me if I'm wrong) but the third row has a minuscule amount of room. Nice looking though, not like the new FFRR. I always wanted one until I saw the new one in the flesh - horrible.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Orange Grove WA
    Posts
    1,274
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by minibloodhound View Post
    Had a look at it, and my first thought was that there is no way it should be called a seven seater. When the D3 came out it was hailed for the packaging and amount of passenger room it had because of its hydro pressed chassis (correct me if I'm wrong) but the third row has a minuscule amount of room. Nice looking though, not like the new FFRR. I always wanted one until I saw the new one in the flesh - horrible.
    The advertising hype goes to great pain to explain that its not a 7 seater....it's a 5+2.
    They don't want prospective customers to think its a people mover.
    Brett.....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St George Dragons Territory, NSW
    Posts
    745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I agree,

    I had a little look at the expo and it seems to have lost the distinctive look of the now superseded sport.

    It definitely looks much bigger and less sporty than the old one.

    Still it is very pretty and I agree the back 2 seat would only be good for small children with no legs !!!

    Regards,

    George.

  5. #5
    XianR Guest

    Wink

    Here in South Africa, the new RRS will be strictly 5-seater, with a full spare wheel instead of the kiddie seats.

    Those low profile tyres and the outback....how does this pan out in practice?

    Finally, as RRS now run on a RR platform, will its sub-forum be moved away from Disco forum?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by XianR View Post
    Finally, as RRS now run on a RR platform, will its sub-forum be moved away from Disco forum?
    That has been discussed. Don't think it will happen any time soon though.

    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoWeb View Post
    It definitely looks much bigger and less sporty than the old one.
    It is a bit bigger as it is based on the full fat chassis, it is a LOT lighter than the old one and a LOT sportier. Active suspension keeps it nearly flat in the corners, even at silly speeds, and the engine is a powerhouse compared to anything they have previously offered. It finally is a Range Rover and it finally is Sporty. Took them a while but they got there.

    Watch Top Gears report on it - it is quite something on the track.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,632
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bacicat View Post
    That has been discussed. Don't think it will happen any time soon though.
    But the Evoque lives in the RR section - go figure.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    But the Evoque lives in the RR section - go figure.
    Yeah, but the Evoque is a bastard child and know one knows where to put it...

    I think the new RRS will stay in the D3/D4/RRS forum so it has some continuity.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  9. #9
    XianR Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bacicat View Post
    Yeah, but the Evoque is a bastard child and know one knows where to put it...

    I think the new RRS will stay in the D3/D4/RRS forum so it has some continuity.
    A quite handsome bastard , yeah! Pimped FL2 and built on the same production line.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,632
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well I want the 101 in the RR section - it is closest to a RRC than anything else.

    Just as logical
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!