Originally Posted by 
TB
				 
			If only it were that simple. The reality of our situation is far more complex and urgent. I’m not at all opposed to solar, wind etc – we can and should use them to the maximum degree that is beneficial. But there are constraints in terms of material resources, location, build time, scalability and cost, which in the end make it impossible to meet all the goals (cheap, fast, sufficient, reliable) to solve the global challenge.
Unless we can perfect CO2 capture and disposal, the fossil fuel industry needs to shut down ASAP. The path to that point is built by renewables and nuclear in combination.
(And I do have sympathy for those whose lives are connected to the fossil fuel industry. I pay a lot of tax and I would vote for government assistance to help transition those workers and communities to something else productive. Nuclear plants could be an in-situ replacement for some existing coal burners. There’ll be lots of work in constructing and running replacement infrastructure all over the country.)