600 lbs = 600L :eek:
you'd want to use a filler with the hold in catch thing for that !
Printable View
As far as I can recall, its nominal capacity was 600 lbs. of LPG. It was larger than the round 100 gallon distillate tanks used on most line haul prime movers at that time. The KMR-XT5 was a single drive prime mover with 6V53 Detroit, RT610 Road Ranger, and an Eaton rear axle. To fit the gas bottle, the fuel tank on that side had to be taken off.
It had to be big as there were few servos outside the major cities then that sold bulk gas.
I have had little to do with LPG other than in camping size cylinders and appliances since then. I do recall that bottles then were sized by nominal capacity in lbs. weight. The normal domestic cylinder was 100lbs.
At that time there was a bonnetted Oshkosh with a big 6 cylinder gas engine, I think it was a Waukesha, that ran Sesame Street, and it carried two of the 600 lb. bottles. I spoke to the owner once at Repco and he told me he had seen these engines used as well head and pipeline pump engines in the USA running on gas straight from the well. He was impressed with the fuel consumption figures and got an Oshkosh custom built on an order from the Australian distributor. He did say that fuel cost per mile was well below the cost of a diesel engine of similar output. Never saw him again and never saw another truck in this configuration so I don't know what the subsequent history was.
I have an APA 1400 across my Chassis under the tray, as well as 2x45 litres in place of the fuel tank. Works well enough.
Forget vapour withdrawal.
Imagine the fuel line size:eek:. It would'nt get certification, therefore un insurable & no rebate too.