Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Identification Help

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    18
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This is my Landy!!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Yup and likely why it was going through a full base overhaul at 2Base Wkshp in 1973.

    You too are a lucky bugger having a Vietnam vet! Will you return it to workshop variant status?



    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    18
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think that would be the only thing to do with it. That will have to happen!

    I was not expecting to find this out about my old spotlighting ute.

    I'd better tell my dad.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    4,990
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well, now we have 2 Land Rovers claiming ARN 112-166, Scott F has S2A 109 chassis No 25304001A, cheers Dennis

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Dinty View Post
    Well, now we have 2 Land Rovers claiming ARN 112-166, Scott F has S2A 109 chassis No 25304001A, cheers Dennis
    Yes , however given the 153101763 rebuild happened in Oct 1973 the most likely scenario is: when Hughie88's chassis was a lube workshop ARN 112-166 in Vietnam Scott's, chassis' was an Auto repair workshop with ARN 108-632. Like most vehicles that returned from SVN they then all want through a full base rebuild when they got back.

    If you talk to people on the 2 base workshop line in those days, they didn't much care which parts were assembled with which vehicle, as long as the ARN left the workshop in the correct census.

    We're the ones who get hung up with the provenance of the vehicles against the chassis and ARN it left service with, but for a significant part of the service the chassis was often under a different ARN and census.

    Just like my gun buggy chassis, was it most of the time under 112-723 that it left service with? Or 112-726 it commenced in service with? Or did they merely swap the plates to send a finished buggy to a unit the ARN was assigned? I don't know but makes for an interesting debate.

    You should also look at the front drag link and LHS dumb-iron, in the images from Vietnam (above), with what you can see, you can't see the steering damper and AFAIK the SIIa army had steering dampers. A retrofit one in the 1963 SIIa and an OEM in the later SIIa. Making the uncut guards and no steering damper likely a SII so Hughie's and probably not Scott's SIIa.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by hughie88 View Post
    Yes Lotz A Landies the winch has been on it as long as I have had the vehicle. Is that a piece of hardware that could have been fitted by the army? Or is it more likely to have been by an owner once the vehicle began civilian life.
    <snip>
    Hi hughie

    The capstan winches were usually only fitted to early ambulances and some GS but rarely to a workshop.

    The majority of winches were the Bamford PTO drum winches. However 174-434 is a 6028B census Truck, Utility, 3/4 Ton, GS, Cargo With Winch so this may be your capstan and have been fitted during the rebuild in 1973.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    18
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes. I had a good look at the REMLR website last night, specifically the census information for the 174-xxx trucks. it was 1 of 2 vehicle that were of the census 6028B which i think makes it a little unique.
    At this stage I can't confirm this however I am very sure the winch assembly is painted in olive drab.

    I have had a read of the posts on this thread from last night regarding the fact that there are now two people that have ARN 112-166.

    I dont know a great deal about landrovers and im still getting my head around a lot of the information on REMLR.

    Is the debate, whether my chassis is the one pictured on the REMLR website and in the photos with Rob Moseley?

    Incidently Robert Moseley is now the Jnr Vice President of the Queensland Vietnam Veterans Association. I found him on the internet last night.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    18
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Lotz-A-Landies.

    Ill quote you;

    "If you talk to people on the 2 base workshop line in those days, they didn't much care which parts were assembled with which vehicle, as long as the ARN left the workshop in the correct census.

    We're the ones who get hung up with the provenance of the vehicles against the chassis and ARN it left service with, but for a significant part of the service the chassis was often under a different ARN and census."

    Apologies I havn't worked out how to do that properly at this stage.

    Are you saying that the plates (the photographed ones) I have might not not match the chassis under my vehicle?

    If this is the case, Is there a location on the chassis that the chassis number is stamped? For better or worse I am interested to confirm this.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Cessnock NSW
    Posts
    4,990
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The chassis number should be stamped on the LHS rear outrigger just above where the LHS shackle plate is attached, you may need to use a wire brush to clean the area cheers Dennis
    Do you have a clear picture of the way the Capstan winch is fitted, as it looks very different to how I remember them being fitted, I also have a Land Rover that is a veteran of the conflict in Sth Vietnam, mine was a Military Police vehicle (Provo),.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by hughie88 View Post
    Lotz-A-Landies.

    Ill quote you;

    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies
    "If you talk to people on the 2 base workshop line in those days, they didn't much care which parts were assembled with which vehicle, as long as the ARN left the workshop in the correct census.

    We're the ones who get hung up with the provenance of the vehicles against the chassis and ARN it left service with, but for a significant part of the service the chassis was often under a different ARN and census."
    Apologies I havn't worked out how to do that properly at this stage.

    Are you saying that the plates (the photographed ones) I have might not not match the chassis under my vehicle?

    If this is the case, Is there a location on the chassis that the chassis number is stamped? For better or worse I am interested to confirm this.
    Hi Hughie

    Not quite, in civilian life in australia the chassis number is the identity of the vehicle. In the Australian Army the ARN was the identity of the vehicle, the chassis was treated as a part.

    In the various base workshops the rebuild lines completely dismantled the vehicles and then repaired/restored each assembly and then built the vehicle back up. Quite frequently the original chassis may not be finished being stripped, repaired and re-painted so they would use another chassis that was finished or one that came off a parts vehicle. The ARN book would then be updated with the change of chassis number. It's the same as getting an exchange engine, rather than reconditioning your own.

    Hence 112-116 started with your chassis and finished service with a different chassis. The most likely time for this to have occurred is during a full base overhaul your chassis had one in october 1973 according to the plate in the image you posted.

    When you look at the images of 112-166 in Vietnam, my opinion is that it has features of a Series 2 vehicle particularly the front guards. Therefore it is most likely that in Vietnam, 112-166 still had your chassis and the chassis swap happened after the return to Oz in or before October 1973.

    Does that make sense?

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!