What CR number is on the block near the dipstick? If it has CR 8.36:1, it's low compression and 91 RON is fine.
![]()
Hi all.
Which octane is best for a '98 4.0? 91, 95 or 98?
Thanks.
What CR number is on the block near the dipstick? If it has CR 8.36:1, it's low compression and 91 RON is fine.
![]()
Ron B.
VK2OTC
2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
2007 Yamaha XJR1300
Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA
RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever
Ron B.
VK2OTC
2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
2007 Yamaha XJR1300
Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA
RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever
In the Owner's Handbook LR recommends 91 as a "MINIMUM" RON for the low comp engine . I generally run 95 (and give up drinking red for a week to make up the difference in $$) There's less tendency for it to ping with the higher RON fuel, esp. on hot days.
I always run 95 in mine, had no choice but to use 91 at the Palmer river roadhouse, got better highway economy on it than I do on premium, however I did notice a much smellier exhaust. Mine's a 99 Bosch 4.6 (unsure of my compression ratio).
Cheers
Keithy
Always ran 95 in my 4.6 MY98. Went much better than on 91
Gary
I saw an episode last year on a motoring show where they did a live test using the three types of fuel. As it turned out, the cars economy improved with the more expensive types so much so that the price difference was negligible. I would be interested in personal experiences...
Horses for coursesI saw an episode last year on a motoring show where they did a live test using the three types of fuel. As it turned out, the cars economy improved with the more expensive types so much so that the price difference was negligible. I would be interested in personal experiences...
A low comp no knock sensor engine will get no benefit from higher octane.
A high compression engine with knock sensors tuned for say 95 or 98 octane (eg BMW , VW ) will get significant benefit from the octane it was designed to use as the timing will be retarded using lower octane .
A clean Gems 8.36:1 or even Thor motronic 8.36 .1 should gain no benefit, although a carboned up Motronic may due to more advance being tolerated without Knock.
Regards Philip A
I have done several trips from BNE < - > CBR in the (Thor) P38 over the past couple of years ...pretty much same load, same schedule, same route... once on 91 and once on 98 the whole way and back. The difference (using GPS distance and pump values) was 1.3 L/100 km in favour of the 98 octane (14.1 vs 12.8). For the others I used 95. ...about 13.2 L/100km.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks