Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: A P38s' preferable octane

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Karratha WA
    Posts
    100
    Total Downloaded
    0

    A P38s' preferable octane

    Hi all.

    Which octane is best for a '98 4.0? 91, 95 or 98?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is online now Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,704
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    What CR number is on the block near the dipstick? If it has CR 8.36:1, it's low compression and 91 RON is fine.

    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Crafers West South Australia
    Posts
    11,732
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sidewinder76 View Post
    Hi all.

    Which octane is best for a '98 4.0? 91, 95 or 98?

    Thanks.
    Check your compression ratio, its next to the engine number, next to the dipstick tube. If it's a standard 8.13 compression just use 91 octane but steer clear of ethanol containing fuels if you can.

    Edit: As Ron said

  4. #4
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is online now Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,704
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by bee utey View Post
    f it's a standard 8.13 compression
    I thought it was 8.13:1, too. In fact, I'd typed that then decided to check my engine(s). Here's a closeup of another engine and like the one above, it definitely reads 8.36:1

    Odd.

    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,233
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In the Owner's Handbook LR recommends 91 as a "MINIMUM" RON for the low comp engine . I generally run 95 (and give up drinking red for a week to make up the difference in $$) There's less tendency for it to ping with the higher RON fuel, esp. on hot days.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Townsville, QLD
    Posts
    2,581
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I always run 95 in mine, had no choice but to use 91 at the Palmer river roadhouse, got better highway economy on it than I do on premium, however I did notice a much smellier exhaust. Mine's a 99 Bosch 4.6 (unsure of my compression ratio).

    Cheers
    Keithy

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Tyrendarra Vic (South West Vic )
    Posts
    1,729
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Always ran 95 in my 4.6 MY98. Went much better than on 91

    Gary

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoges View Post
    (and give up drinking red for a week to make up the difference in $$) .
    I saw an episode last year on a motoring show where they did a live test using the three types of fuel. As it turned out, the cars economy improved with the more expensive types so much so that the price difference was negligible. I would be interested in personal experiences...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I saw an episode last year on a motoring show where they did a live test using the three types of fuel. As it turned out, the cars economy improved with the more expensive types so much so that the price difference was negligible. I would be interested in personal experiences...
    Horses for courses
    A low comp no knock sensor engine will get no benefit from higher octane.

    A high compression engine with knock sensors tuned for say 95 or 98 octane (eg BMW , VW ) will get significant benefit from the octane it was designed to use as the timing will be retarded using lower octane .

    A clean Gems 8.36:1 or even Thor motronic 8.36 .1 should gain no benefit, although a carboned up Motronic may due to more advance being tolerated without Knock.
    Regards Philip A

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,233
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have done several trips from BNE < - > CBR in the (Thor) P38 over the past couple of years ...pretty much same load, same schedule, same route... once on 91 and once on 98 the whole way and back. The difference (using GPS distance and pump values) was 1.3 L/100 km in favour of the 98 octane (14.1 vs 12.8). For the others I used 95. ...about 13.2 L/100km.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!