It isn't strange then that my WWII Ford V8 had stainless exhaust valves from new. But you would want them with these engines, as to adjust the valve clearances you have to remove the valves.
Aaron.
Printable View
It isn't strange then that my WWII Ford V8 had stainless exhaust valves from new. But you would want them with these engines, as to adjust the valve clearances you have to remove the valves.
Aaron.
As you know hesguitar, Falcon heads are all overhead valve, wheras the 2.6 landy engine has overhead inlet valves and side exhaust valves, so no amount of head modifications will reduce the incidence of exhaust valve burning.IMO one reason why they are susceptible to burning, aside from fuel mixture and clearances, is that the exhaust valves are just too small for the engine capacity.
However,a friend who used to rally a Rover saloon way back in the day, did have a great deal of success with stainless valves.as well as a significant reduction in oil consumption by plugging every second oil hole in the piston ring lands with grub screws.
Wagoo.
If you think about the design of sidevalve v8s,they need all the help they can get re valves and cooling. The valves are inboard of the cylinders, so the hot exhaust gasses have to cross over through the block and coolant to reach the manifolds on the outboard side.I believe it was the reason that the Chevrolet CMP (Blitz) 4x4s were more successful in war time operations in hotter climates.
Wagoo.
Do you own either a Ford or Chevrolet Blitz?
Aaron.
I had a SWB 15cwt Chev Blitz about 30years ago with only 12,000 miles on the clock.Had 9.00x16 semi offroad tyres and only a single speed transfercase.Sold it to some tree loppers after I bogged it on my front lawn and realised it didn't ''do what it said on the tin'':)
Wagoo.