Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Motor Transplant

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Gold Coast QLD
    Posts
    1,746
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by harry View Post
    I suspect there may be something wrong with the engine or tuning, sure they are a bit slow off the mark, but it should get up to speed quicker than what you describe.
    I have a standard engine petrol 2a with 3.5 diffs and quite easily jump off at the lights with most modern manual cars, the taller diffs give longer legs for gear changes and quite frequently I am ahead of the mix without trying.
    I do not rev the car hard, and change gears when it feels right, I don't want to blow it up!
    it will sit on 110 happily and probably does 120kph, if pushed, wind resistance is a killer when driving a box!
    my engine has valve seats to suit unleaded, nothing else, but it is timed correctly and looked after, just did another oil change and the engine might have done 2000 kms if that.
    Harry, I tried to follow you when you had the camper trailer on the back of HJM. Ralph wouldn't go that fast over a
    cliff with a tail wind! and yes, there about as aerodynamic as a core filled besser block!
    1964, S2a SWB "Ralph"
    1977, S3 SWB "Smeg" (Gone)
    1996 D1 300tdi auto (Gone)
    1973 Rangie Classic (Gone)
    2012, 110 (Series 12) Puma "The Tardis"
    1962 109" Tray Back "Ernie"
    1998 D1 300tdi (Dizzy)
    2017 Kawasaki Versys 1000

    You must now cut down the tallest tree in the forest... With... A HERRING!!!!!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast Queensland Australia
    Posts
    6,469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    fuel economy is a bad question, as I have no way of calculating it, the speedo is in miles per hour, and bears no resemblance to what is really happening, so I haven't tried to work it out.
    not having a large tank also makes thinking about fuel use important, but I carry spare fuel anyway.
    running lt225/75r16 road tyres, as they came cheap on a set of widies, but these are really too small in diameter, making the car too close to the ground with clearance issues, but no tyre noise and good comfortable ride considering the rest of the suspension needs a restoration, sagged springs etc. will fix that once I get it all back to a station wagon and know the real ride height.
    Safe Travels
    harry

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by harry View Post
    fuel economy is a bad question, as I have no way of calculating it, the speedo is in miles per hour, and bears no resemblance to what is really happening, so I haven't tried to work it out.
    not having a large tank also makes thinking about fuel use important, but I carry spare fuel anyway.
    running lt225/75r16 road tyres, as they came cheap on a set of widies, but these are really too small in diameter, making the car too close to the ground with clearance issues, but no tyre noise and good comfortable ride considering the rest of the suspension needs a restoration, sagged springs etc. will fix that once I get it all back to a station wagon and know the real ride height.


    With those tyres (approx 700mm dia) and the 3.54's if you multiply your odometer reading by 1.3 it will give you a close idea of distance travelled.
    I have 3.54's in my series 3 and have similar profile tyres.


    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    266
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by harry View Post
    fuel economy is a bad question, as I have no way of calculating it, the speedo is in miles per hour, and bears no resemblance to what is really happening, so I haven't tried to work it out.
    not having a large tank also makes thinking about fuel use important, but I carry spare fuel anyway.
    running lt225/75r16 road tyres, as they came cheap on a set of widies, but these are really too small in diameter, making the car too close to the ground with clearance issues, but no tyre noise and good comfortable ride considering the rest of the suspension needs a restoration, sagged springs etc. will fix that once I get it all back to a station wagon and know the real ride height.
    I found an easy way work out fuel consumption, all you need is a "smart" phone with GPS software on it, this will tell you the distance travelled. So all you need to do is fill the tank and start the GPS software, go for a drive and note the distance travelled and then go back and fill up and note the amount of fuel used and distance travelled. I used this on a few old cars with dubious odometer readings.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    312
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Seriestwo View Post
    I found an easy way work out fuel consumption, all you need is a "smart" phone with GPS software on it, this will tell you the distance travelled. So all you need to do is fill the tank and start the GPS software, go for a drive and note the distance travelled and then go back and fill up and note the amount of fuel used and distance travelled. I used this on a few old cars with dubious odometer readings.
    sign posts between towns have been doing this for years

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,757
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Very good points already bought up.

    My experience is with a Holden 186 in a LWB, standard diffs, on 32" and 31" tyres. 32" tyres are way better IMO, much more relaxed driving. The old 186 will pull the car along with the traffic at the lights and if I want I can ever put a scare in some cars if I thrash a bit. 4x4ing though, the 186 leave a lot to be desired, not enough bottom end torque and my engine gets hot quick if the air flow is reduced for too long.

    I'm currently building up a SWB with standard diffs, ashcroft high speed transfer and a 200tdi. Google 200tdi engine swaps over in england, they quote 30-40mpg which is like 10 L/100kms i think - sounds a little too good to be true really but I'm hoping I can get close to that.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Armadale
    Posts
    20
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Our series 2a was fitted with r16 7.0 road tyres because we couldnt purchase 7.5's in time for our trip from Melb to Perth.

    Our series 2a is all original, has a fairely o/d fitted, and has a rebuilt engine, new carb etc.

    Our highway consumption was 200 to 220 miles per 11 gallon tank, twin tanks kept full, vehicle also had 4 22 litre jerry cans, two 100 kilo humans and 3 sut cases.

    The catch was we traveled at 50 mph.

    Standard highway consumption here in Perth at 65 MPH is about 140 miles per 11 gallon tank


  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Queensland (though occasionally elsewhere)
    Posts
    1,431
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by debruiser View Post
    Very good points already bought up.

    My experience is with a Holden 186 in a LWB, standard diffs, on 32" and 31" tyres. 32" tyres are way better IMO, much more relaxed driving. The old 186 will pull the car along with the traffic at the lights and if I want I can ever put a scare in some cars if I thrash a bit. 4x4ing though, the 186 leave a lot to be desired, not enough bottom end torque and my engine gets hot quick if the air flow is reduced for too long.

    I'm currently building up a SWB with standard diffs, ashcroft high speed transfer and a 200tdi. Google 200tdi engine swaps over in england, they quote 30-40mpg which is like 10 L/100kms i think - sounds a little too good to be true really but I'm hoping I can get close to that.
    I had a 186 in my IIA and turfed it for a 2.25D. Best thing I ever did.

    That sort of consumption sounds reasonable for a 200Tdi if the vehicle and gearing (and the way it's driven) is right. I have a 200Tdi Defender which gets consumption figures similar to that. Just under 30mpg usually (my 2.25D IIA gets 30mpg rain, hail or shine) - and on one particular run she came in just under 39mpg. I must have been holding my mouth right that day.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Austral, Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Also make sure your wheel alignment is done right.. I had mine done, and my landy seemed to have troubles hitting 80K's.. I did a little tweaking myself, and I can now get to 80+K's no trouble at all, with little effort..

    Plus engine timing & tuning as other mentioned can be a factor too.

    Wolf
    1972 - S3 LWB (109) Wagon - Parts
    1974 - S3 LWB (109) Wagon - Jess - (Registered)
    1975 - S3 LWB (109) Wagon - Parts
    1978 - S3 LWB (109) Wagon - Parts
    1979 - S3 SWB (88) Utility - Aurora (TBR)
    2014 - Defender (110) - Cher (MY15)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!