Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Tyre Choices: Bar Treads versus Hi-Milers

  1. 13th April 2013, 06:05 PM #21
    101RRS's Avatar
    101RRS
    101RRS is offline LordRover Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRanger View Post


    900-16 still not a bad price for a 35" tyre.
    Are you importing these as well?
    XZLs 255/100 R 16 (equiv of 9.00x16 - just a tad taller) are a lot more expensive than $400.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 13th April 2013, 06:47 PM #22
    LowRanger's Avatar
    LowRanger
    LowRanger is offline ChatterBox Subscriber
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    XZLs 255/100 R 16 (equiv of 9.00x16 - just a tad taller) are a lot more expensive than $400.
    The XZL's are really a 36" tyre in that size and are a steel belted radial,and the Petlas NT3 is a cross ply tyre.Either way,both are far superior to bar treads,both on road and off road.
    Anyone that thinks that bar treads are ok on road and good off road,either hasn't done many miles on them or has a bad memory
    Wayne
    ​VK2VRC
    "LandRover" What the Japanese aspire to be
    Taking the road less travelled
    '01 130 dualcab HCPU locked and loaded
    LowRange 116.76:1
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
« Stage One current leak | what are these sides off? »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Search AULRO.com ONLY!
 Search All the Web!