No.
Oil gets thinner as it heats up, thicker as it cools. The aim of the manufacturer is to make it STAY thicker when it's hot, and stay thinner when cold.
So the 100C viscosity is much less than the 40C, and waaayy less than at 0C. That's why we drain the oil when it's hot, it's thinner!
The W rating is based on the temperature at which the oils thickens to a set viscosity. If it gets that thick at -12C, it is rated 85W, if at -26C it is 80W etc.
So the blender is attempting to stop the oil getting too thick at low temperatures, whilst also stopping it from getting too "runny" at high temperatures. There are three ways to achieve this:
1/ Use a synthetic oil which has a more stable viscosity profile
2/ Add viscosity modifiers that react to temperature increases
3/ Blend various mineral oils, thicker and thinner ones, to achieve a mix that stays in spec.
Synthetic oil is expensive, but most 75W/xx are synthetic simply because it's too hard to make mineral oil behave this way. Viscosity modifiers are also expensive, and may impact other aspects of gear oil performance. Option 3/, blending mineral oils to suit, allows the manufacturer to cheaply meet the 80W or 85W specification. However as a side effect of keeping the oil thin enough at low temperatures, it is often (as seen in the specs I quoted previously) also at the low end of the SAE90 high temperature viscosity. The SAE90 specification is a range, and it's easier to hit the lower end of the range - the customer, after all, is never expected to investigate any further than the shiny packaging! A straight EP90, because the low temperature viscosity is not specified, can be more easily made to stay at the high end of the SAE90 specification.

