Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 44

Thread: Say ta ta to the Puma next year...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Say ta ta to the Puma next year...

    Apparently the Transit engine won't meet the new Euro emission's standard so a new engine is to be fitted next year according to the feeds.

    A huuuge 2.2 litres in capacity.

    Land Rover Defender (2011) scooped | Secret New Cars | Car Magazine Online



    So much for any commercial use/sales here anymore.

    BTW, check the comment underneath.
    These blokes design the cars for tomorrow.
    Yep, a plug in hybrid is just the thing for commercial use and remote area work......

    The next Defender should showcase JLR technologies... and become the ultimate Green machine.
    Be innovative and fresh, Include new build methods, Recycled materials, lightweight plastic body panels, hybrid/plug-in/diesel power


    I wish these blokes would leave the CBD sometimes. A Defender isn't a city car.

  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Apparently the Transit engine won't meet the new Euro emission's standard so a new engine is to be fitted next year according to the feeds.

    A huuuge 2.2 litres in capacity.

    Land Rover Defender (2011) scooped | Secret New Cars | Car Magazine Online



    So much for any commercial use/sales here anymore.
    Despite the reduction in capacity the article says "increased power & torque". And I don't remember any adverse comments on performance grounds when going from the 2.5 Td5 to the 2.4 Puma.

    The fact is that once you provide boosted induction in an engine, performance is not tied to engine capacity. And the presumably lighter engine is likely to provide other benefits. How succesful the engine turns out to be will depend on a lot of factors, but the absolute capacity is a long way down the list.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If its getting the same 2.2 from the current Freelander, which is probably a safe bet, there shouldn't any problems with power and torque as long as they don't have to detune it too much.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Despite the reduction in capacity the article says "increased power & torque". And I don't remember any adverse comments on performance grounds when going from the 2.5 Td5 to the 2.4 Puma.

    The fact is that once you provide boosted induction in an engine, performance is not tied to engine capacity. And the presumably lighter engine is likely to provide other benefits. How succesful the engine turns out to be will depend on a lot of factors, but the absolute capacity is a long way down the list.

    John

    Torque off idle and engine braking are two things I'm constantly reminded of when jumping from the Defender to the Patrol John.

    You just can't beat displacement in those two areas.

    Two more reasons why i want go 4BD1T

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm sorry Rick,,

    I just had too---
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift View Post
    I'm sorry Rick,,

    I just had too---



    Stick it to da man!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    regading capacity, all things being equal....2 engines with the same power out put, one small and one big...which one is doing more work, which one should last longer in the real world....small FID are fine in cars...but not IMO in work trucks....oh and im not talking 6 or 7 liters....just something like 3-4....makes a difference over 2.2-2.5....

    rant rant rant

  8. #8
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Torque off idle and engine braking are two things I'm constantly reminded of when jumping from the Defender to the Patrol John.

    You just can't beat displacement in those two areas.

    Two more reasons why i want go 4BD1T
    Not necessarily a problem with small capacity, although I agree that it often is a problem. To get good torque off idle from a small engine, you need a big turbocharger, probably with variable geometry, to get lots of air in at low engine speed.

    And you also have to build the engine solidly enough and with a big enough flywheel to stand up to the power pulses. In fact this is probably why there is usually a lack of torque off idle on small engines - the smaller capacity does not need as big a flywheel to idle smoothly so it doesn't get it!

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    344
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Apparently the Transit engine won't meet the new Euro emission's standard so a new engine is to be fitted next year according to the feeds.

    A huuuge 2.2 litres in capacity.

    Land Rover Defender (2011) scooped | Secret New Cars | Car Magazine Online



    So much for any commercial use/sales here anymore.

    BTW, check the comment underneath.
    These blokes design the cars for tomorrow.
    Yep, a plug in hybrid is just the thing for commercial use and remote area work......

    The next Defender should showcase JLR technologies... and become the ultimate Green machine.
    Be innovative and fresh, Include new build methods, Recycled materials, lightweight plastic body panels, hybrid/plug-in/diesel power


    I wish these blokes would leave the CBD sometimes. A Defender isn't a city car.
    Well it would seem that the PUMA may just be the last of the "real" defenders................on another not how much would it cost/or is it possible to get the new TDV8 into the PUMA ?? If my numbers come up I'm going to do that

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Arrh well,looks like I'm rebuilding my Tdi with worked head,VNT,mandrel exhaust and 4HP22. Pat

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!