Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Size of Koni & Bilstein Shocks vs genuine LR ones

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    69
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Size of Koni & Bilstein Shocks vs genuine LR ones

    Hello,
    I am considering buying a set of either Koni Heavytrack SPX shock absorbers or an equivalent in Bilstein in order to replace my genuine Land Rover ones.
    The thing is I need to know the length and diameter of the Koni's and Bilsteins in orfer to be sure they will fit with my current suspension setup.

    This is because my Defender 110 Td5 (built in 1999) has a small home-made lift: 3.3 cms done using spacers beneath the springs. In the back there is no problem because the shock absorbers go outside the spring, But in the front I am afraid that longer or wider shocks may not fit.

    Does anybody have a picture that compares the size of genuine LR shocks vs Koni Heavy Track SPX or Bilsteins? Or the length and diameter of the Koni's?

    By the way: does anybody know the difference between the Koni HT and the Koni HT SPX shocks? According to Koni's specification sheet my Defende 110 shoul go with the SPX ones but I do not know the reason.

    Thanks in advance!
    Cheers,
    Santiago, Mendoza, Argentina

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    2,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here's a link that will give you the standard length and from there you can figure out if you either want to get a longer shock, move the shock mounts up or make the rubber bump stops bigger to fit a longer shock.
    land rover shock specifications

    Here you can find the sizes of the 6 and 7 series billies:

    Bilstein

    You can go either standard OME shocks or fit a kit like Gwyn lewis with N73L (now called 60070L) shock and adaptors for the rear:
    Challenge Kit Gwyn Lewis 4x4 Challenge Suspension Kit can be fitted to Defender 90, 110, Discovery 1, RRC. The lift kit for winch challenge competitions, off road events.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Meredith vic
    Posts
    292
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Koni shocks

    Quote Originally Posted by SG1 View Post
    Hello,
    I am considering buying a set of either Koni Heavytrack SPX shock absorbers or an equivalent in Bilstein in order to replace my genuine Land Rover ones.
    The thing is I need to know the length and diameter of the Koni's and Bilsteins in orfer to be sure they will fit with my current suspension setup.

    This is because my Defender 110 Td5 (built in 1999) has a small home-made lift: 3.3 cms done using spacers beneath the springs. In the back there is no problem because the shock absorbers go outside the spring, But in the front I am afraid that longer or wider shocks may not fit.

    Does anybody have a picture that compares the size of genuine LR shocks vs Koni Heavy Track SPX or Bilsteins? Or the length and diameter of the Koni's?

    By the way: does anybody know the difference between the Koni HT and the Koni HT SPX shocks? According to Koni's specification sheet my Defende 110 shoul go with the SPX ones but I do not know the reason.

    Thanks in advance!
    Cheers,
    Santiago, Mendoza, Argentina
    Personally you will be better off with Koni oil shocks not the SPX, as they have a longer life span. Both Koni and Bilstein shocks to suit a std vehicle are same length as the factory shocks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    69
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks guys!

    Dave,
    When you say fitting Koni oil shocks do you mean the Koni Heavy Tracks?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,575
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I crawled under the Defender last night to see if I could work out the model number of my Bilsteins, it was getting dark, they are quite dirty and my eyesight ain't what it used to be, this is what I came up with:

    Front: F4-B45-0243-H3
    Rear: K4-6ES-6220-M0

    I've trawled through the Bilstein specs and even allowing for the fact that I probably misread BE5 as B45 & 6ES , and possibly 6243 as 0243 I can't find those numbers anywhere.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by landrover dave View Post
    Personally you will be better off with Koni oil shocks not the SPX, as they have a longer life span. Both Koni and Bilstein shocks to suit a std vehicle are same length as the factory shocks.


    An 'SPX' suffix Koni is just a low pressure gas version of a standard 82 series twin tube damper.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    69
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks guys.

    As it is easier to get the OME shocks here in Argentina I am currently considering buying the OME 60037 and OME 60039 for my Defender 110, without modifying springs.

    Does anybody know if they fit in a standard Defender without any mods?
    In other words are they the same lenght and diamter of the original Defender shocks?

    Nevertheless I am a bit concerned about the fact that the OME shocks come with poliurethane bushes, which I do not like for the suspension of the Defender in general (I prefer rubber ones, based on bad experience with Polybushes). Do the poliurethane bushes of the OME shocks restrict articulation or cause any trouble (stifness?)?

    If I go for OME shocks I will probably add an OMESD32 steering damper to my purchase. Does anybody have any negative opinion with respect to this steering damper? I currently have an old Britpart one which needs replacement and the idea is improvng in this respect.

    I haven't driven much around Australia (been there just once) but I imagine that your washboard dirt roads may ressemble the rough dirt roads we have in Argentina and that's one of the several reasons why I am interested on your opinions about shocks for the Defender.


    Thanks for your help!
    Cheers
    Stgo

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had the OME shocks on the back of my Defender, with a 2" spring lift. The shocks restricted downward travel, allowing only 3cm of extension. The springs had another 10cm of extension in them before they even looked like dislocating.

    I ended up replacing them with Bilsteins. A full discussion of the process is on the following link.

    Shock Absorbers (rear 110)

    I hope that helps.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    69
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Michael 2,

    Thanks for the data.
    I was about to buy a set of OME Nitrocharger Sports but after reading a bit about cases where they (OME) restrict axle articulation and also after receiving a response from a provider of Koni shocks from the States (Ultrarev) I am still considering buying either the Koni HT SPX or the Knoi Raids.

    Does anybody know if the Koni SPX's and Raids use rubber bushes instead of poliurethane ones?

    Is it true that if I fit Koni Raids they may touch against the coil in the front when under full axle articulation because of their significantly larger diameter?

    Anybody knows if the Koni Raids require regular maintenance as do the OME LTR shocks?

    I hope to take a decision and buy them between today and tomorrow.
    Any advice on this will be really appreciated!
    Cheers,
    Stgo

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    First up, 'standard' Koni's will only allow the same travel as 'standard' OME's or Bilsteins, they will all be within a few mm of each other in opened and closed lengths.

    If you are only after a stock setup any of the three will be fine.

    Re Michaels comment regarding OME's in his lifted 110, in a 130 the stock Land Rover shock absorber allows less droop travel in a standard 130 without any load in the back.

    Please read the thread he linked to. It answers most of your questions.

    The aftermarket dampers are just mirroring the standard dampers stroke, and you will find the same thing with any aftermarket damper, unless they are specifically built for long travel suspensions.
    Koni's Raid doesn't give any more travel in the long rear version, they just use a longer body so actual stroke is identical, but allows a bit more droop when the rear is lifted 50mm.
    The front Raid damper is still standard stroke.
    There is a long stroke version of the Bilstein damper available in Australia, but you need to modify the turret and rear top mount to fit it as it has 50mm more stroke than stoke, meaning the damper is 100mm longer than 'normal'.

    In the past most of us just used a Koni 82-2385 or OME N73 or N73L in the front to get more travel, (these are from the front of a Toyota Landcruiser 80 Series) but you must lift the towers to fit these dampers or they will go metal to metal (bottom out) on bump, and you must allow 20mm of bump stop compression, or install longer bump stops.

    Koni use rubber bushes. They are very good quality. I have a mix of urethane and rubber on the Land Rover without issue. Our Patrol has standard Koni rubbers all round, they last very well.
    Urethane is a very good material if the right hardness is used by the manufacturer. I use Super Pro.

    The springs may rub a Raid as not all springs are created equally and some flex and banana on compression. generally that's a sign of a less than best quality spring.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!