nope its got to be engineered and then pitted.
If you are in brissy I have a fairly friendly engineer and a friendly roadworthy bloke.
I am getting to the stage where I need to make up my mind as to what engine to run in my project 109" tray back Orriginally it had the 2.6l 6 in it.
It currentley has a falcon 250 x flow in it but I am not happy with the state of how the conversion was done I don't think it will pass going over the pits how it is now. my other big concern is the legalities of having a 4l engine replacing a 2.6 in WA, I really don't want to have the hassel and expence of going through the engineering proving tests if they apply to this conversion.
My current options are:
I have a 186 from a rusted s2 I could put in so have all the addaptors.
I Know of a good 2.6 landrover 6 that could go back in for licencing puposes then just put the good stuff in later.
Also have a ED33 and a 4bd1 sitting at the shed. Would love a diesel but looks like will be a hassel fitting
If it was not a 6cyl chassis it would be a no brainer and would just put a 2.5 landy diesel in.
I would love a 200 tdi but can't justify the expence to the minerstry of finance and war.
A this stage I am probably leaning towards the 186 as I can get rid of all the dodgy falcon mounts, I have all the parts and being a lover capacity engine than the falcon hopfully less drama getting it re-licenced.
If I was to go the 186 route how do I go about getting it all re-licenced in wa do I still have to go through the engineers approval rubbish or is it a simple matter of putting it over the pits?
nope its got to be engineered and then pitted.
If you are in brissy I have a fairly friendly engineer and a friendly roadworthy bloke.
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
No I am in WA. just got back from having a nosey at the s2 and it is actually a red 138 a mate just told me it was probably a factory fitted motor. Has anyone had any experience with these engines?
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
No not really interested in a v8 just wanted a simple way of getting the old girl back on the road without the hassels, looks like the easiest way will be able to do this is to put a 2.6 in temporaraly to get it re licenced then replace afterwards with another donk. I know its a bit dodgy but as it will only be used as a fishing bus on south cost of wa it is unlikeley it will ever see a town or other trafic again.
Surley all these holden powered landies out there have just been retrofitted with no interferance from the powers that be.
That's something I wouldn't mind finding out. I spoke to our local pit man here in Collie who said it would be no problem to register as long as it was a pre-engineered conversion kit that came from a reputable company. Mine was a kit from Seaton Engineering in Perth. He also told me that there was no need to fit an imobiliser because of it's age (1979), the one thing he was not sure on was the standard Land Rover rear seats in the back which actually have four lap belts fitted. The key thing to do is go and talk to one of these pit people first to see what they will and won't pass without extra engineering approval. Some of them will not tell you a thing prior, simply charge you $90 to take it over, fail it, then give you a list of things that must be done (usually a couple of things they can do in their workshop).
What's your location?
I have 2 x series Landrovers with 186 / 179 holden conversions and would be very interested in knowing the outcome of your query as I am yet to get either vehicle registered (I'm in WA also).
I heard of a bloke who recently did South West to Canning Stock Route trip in a S3 with 202 conversion without any major issues which makes me think the Holden Landrover configuration is a suitable option.
i'm in the center of nowhere, Hyden. Thats the same kind of responce I have been getting to but no definate answer. Also with going to a lower capacity engine was hoping would get away with no engineers ticket being needed. Keeping the falcon in its a big jump from 2.6 to 4L.
yeah thats what I am thinking. I also belive has a thing about % of increased HP will raise eye brows
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks