Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Another Engine Conversion Thread

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    368
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Another Engine Conversion Thread

    I am getting to the stage where I need to make up my mind as to what engine to run in my project 109" tray back Orriginally it had the 2.6l 6 in it.

    It currentley has a falcon 250 x flow in it but I am not happy with the state of how the conversion was done I don't think it will pass going over the pits how it is now. my other big concern is the legalities of having a 4l engine replacing a 2.6 in WA, I really don't want to have the hassel and expence of going through the engineering proving tests if they apply to this conversion.

    My current options are:
    I have a 186 from a rusted s2 I could put in so have all the addaptors.

    I Know of a good 2.6 landrover 6 that could go back in for licencing puposes then just put the good stuff in later.

    Also have a ED33 and a 4bd1 sitting at the shed. Would love a diesel but looks like will be a hassel fitting

    If it was not a 6cyl chassis it would be a no brainer and would just put a 2.5 landy diesel in.

    I would love a 200 tdi but can't justify the expence to the minerstry of finance and war.

    A this stage I am probably leaning towards the 186 as I can get rid of all the dodgy falcon mounts, I have all the parts and being a lover capacity engine than the falcon hopfully less drama getting it re-licenced.

    If I was to go the 186 route how do I go about getting it all re-licenced in wa do I still have to go through the engineers approval rubbish or is it a simple matter of putting it over the pits?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    nope its got to be engineered and then pitted.

    If you are in brissy I have a fairly friendly engineer and a friendly roadworthy bloke.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    368
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No I am in WA. just got back from having a nosey at the s2 and it is actually a red 138 a mate just told me it was probably a factory fitted motor. Has anyone had any experience with these engines?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Randylandy View Post
    No I am in WA. just got back from having a nosey at the s2 and it is actually a red 138 a mate just told me it was probably a factory fitted motor. Has anyone had any experience with these engines?
    No factory holden motors in a landy. Have you considered an early carbied Rover 3.5 V8. Alternatively though much rarer and maybe parts coulod be an issue the 3 litre version of the Rover 2.6 six. I understand it is a much nicer engine than the 2.6.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    368
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No not really interested in a v8 just wanted a simple way of getting the old girl back on the road without the hassels, looks like the easiest way will be able to do this is to put a 2.6 in temporaraly to get it re licenced then replace afterwards with another donk. I know its a bit dodgy but as it will only be used as a fishing bus on south cost of wa it is unlikeley it will ever see a town or other trafic again.

    Surley all these holden powered landies out there have just been retrofitted with no interferance from the powers that be.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Collie W.A.
    Posts
    588
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Randylandy View Post
    Surley all these holden powered landies out there have just been retrofitted with no interferance from the powers that be.
    That's something I wouldn't mind finding out. I spoke to our local pit man here in Collie who said it would be no problem to register as long as it was a pre-engineered conversion kit that came from a reputable company. Mine was a kit from Seaton Engineering in Perth. He also told me that there was no need to fit an imobiliser because of it's age (1979), the one thing he was not sure on was the standard Land Rover rear seats in the back which actually have four lap belts fitted. The key thing to do is go and talk to one of these pit people first to see what they will and won't pass without extra engineering approval. Some of them will not tell you a thing prior, simply charge you $90 to take it over, fail it, then give you a list of things that must be done (usually a couple of things they can do in their workshop).

    What's your location?

  7. #7
    smith2a Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Randylandy View Post
    If I was to go the 186 route how do I go about getting it all re-licenced in wa do I still have to go through the engineers approval rubbish or is it a simple matter of putting it over the pits?
    I have 2 x series Landrovers with 186 / 179 holden conversions and would be very interested in knowing the outcome of your query as I am yet to get either vehicle registered (I'm in WA also).

    I heard of a bloke who recently did South West to Canning Stock Route trip in a S3 with 202 conversion without any major issues which makes me think the Holden Landrover configuration is a suitable option.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    368
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i'm in the center of nowhere, Hyden. Thats the same kind of responce I have been getting to but no definate answer. Also with going to a lower capacity engine was hoping would get away with no engineers ticket being needed. Keeping the falcon in its a big jump from 2.6 to 4L.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Collie W.A.
    Posts
    588
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Randylandy View Post
    i'm in the center of nowhere, Hyden. Thats the same kind of responce I have been getting to but no definate answer. Also with going to a lower capacity engine was hoping would get away with no engineers ticket being needed. Keeping the falcon in its a big jump from 2.6 to 4L.
    I've heard before that they don't mind a 6cyl going into a car that was originally a 6cyl, it's only when you put a 6cyl or V8 into something that was originally a 4cyl when they start to ask for engineer certificates for the brakes and such.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    368
    Total Downloaded
    0
    yeah thats what I am thinking. I also belive has a thing about % of increased HP will raise eye brows

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!