Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Defender 300tdi vs 200tdi

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Defender 300tdi vs 200tdi

    G'Day All,

    This is my very first post and I am looking for some advice from all the very wise Land Rover owners on the site.

    I'm trying to decide between a 1994 200tdi Defender 110 and a 1995 300tdi Defender 110. Both have around 250k km.

    From my research I've found that the engines are very similar in performance, on paper, but the 300 is an updated version of the 200 creating a more refined and quieter engine.

    My question is, what are the main differences between the two engines (200tdi vs 300tdi)?

    Thank you!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Atwell, Western Australia
    Posts
    427
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i'm sure this is open for much debate..

    but i find the 300 tdi alot better engine with far less problems...

    The 300Tdi are noticeably smoother and quieter than the 200Tdi, but are generally found to not be quite as economical in real-world use

  3. #3
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is not just the 300 Tdi vs 200 Tdi that you are looking at here.

    The 300 Tdi is coupled to a R380 gearbox whereas the 200 Tdi will be coupled to an LT77 gearbox. The R380 is a better box.

    Not sure at what stage they changed from 10 spline to 24 spline axles but by 300 Tdi 95 fender came with 24 spline axles which are better than the 10 spline. Some one else will have to confirm if the spline change was also coupled to the 200/300 Tdi update.

    The fans of the 200 Tdi will tell you that the 300 Tdi is problematic in as far as the timing belt is concerned. Yes the 300 Tdi did have some problems with the early timing belt arrangements but if the 300 Tdi has done 250k km then they will have been well an truely sorted by now. A yellow mark on the timing case will indicate if the timing case and injection pump have been sorted to prevent the timing belts from failing prematurely.

    300 Tdi runs a few more pounds of boost (maybe only a 2-3 lb/in2) so I would think that they should run better than the 200 Tdi, all other things being equal.

    I don't think there is much more difference. I have a 300 Tdi so I would recommend that you go the same if only for the gearbox and a year newer model.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Tassie/Perth
    Posts
    1,454
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Over 500k on my 200tDi and still going along alright

    LT77 is still going well too



    Look honestly buy the one that's in better condition - they are both good engines.





    Edit - they are a 24 spline axle too

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pistolpete View Post
    i'm sure this is open for much debate..

    but i find the 300 tdi alot better engine with far less problems...

    The 300Tdi are noticeably smoother and quieter than the 200Tdi, but are generally found to not be quite as economical in real-world use

    I am intrigued how the 300Tdi is supposed to be a better motor with far less problems.I think the 200Tdi has less inherent problems.
    And being not as smooth isn't a problem,it's in a Defender

    Wayne

  6. #6
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I can pretty much compare apples with apples as I;ve owned Defenders with both engines. My opinion -

    .

    The 300Tdi/R380 combo is definitely better on the highway, revving lower for a given speed.

    The 200Tdi/LT77 combo is better off road. Partly to do with the engine revving characteristics / fact the turbo spins up quicker (maybe) but the gear ratios are lower and engine braking is better.

    I wouldn't hesitate to own a 200 again I really enjoyed it, but I'm happy with my 300 too.

    One thing that seems to be the case is that "bits" and accessories are easier to get for the 300Tdi than the 200Tdi - probably due to the fact there are a lot of 300's out there and nowhere near as many 200's.

    Allmy opinion.

    Drive em both and pick the engine that suits you better THEN go and find a good truck with that engine.

    Cheers
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    I can pretty much compare apples with apples as I;ve owned Defenders with both engines. My opinion -

    .

    The 300Tdi/R380 combo is definitely better on the highway, revving lower for a given speed.

    The 200Tdi/LT77 combo is better off road. Partly to do with the engine revving characteristics / fact the turbo spins up quicker (maybe) but the gear ratios are lower and engine braking is better.

    I wouldn't hesitate to own a 200 again I really enjoyed it, but I'm happy with my 300 too.

    One thing that seems to be the case is that "bits" and accessories are easier to get for the 300Tdi than the 200Tdi - probably due to the fact there are a lot of 300's out there and nowhere near as many 200's.

    Allmy opinion.

    Drive em both and pick the engine that suits you better THEN go and find a good truck with that engine.

    Cheers
    Agree with the above, but I'l add that 200tdi's are much more labour intensive to work on, therefore more costly if you aren't doing it yourself.

    The 200 Tdi IMO are a better, stronger and very much underrated engine, but I'd prefer to own a 300Tdi.

    If that makes sense.





    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Queensland (though occasionally elsewhere)
    Posts
    1,431
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    Agree with the above, but I'l add that 200tdi's are much more labour intensive to work on, therefore more costly if you aren't doing it yourself.

    The 200 Tdi IMO are a better, stronger and very much underrated engine, but I'd prefer to own a 300Tdi.

    If that makes sense.





    JC
    Um, not really.

  9. #9
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    Agree with the above, but I'l add that 200tdi's are much more labour intensive to work on, therefore more costly if you aren't doing it yourself.

    The 200 Tdi IMO are a better, stronger and very much underrated engine, but I'd prefer to own a 300Tdi.

    If that makes sense.
    No it doesn't, specially as you are a mechanic and can work on the car yourself

    confused?

    Sure am!
    JC
    ...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Queensland (though occasionally elsewhere)
    Posts
    1,431
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    I can pretty much compare apples with apples as I;ve owned Defenders with both engines. My opinion -

    .

    The 300Tdi/R380 combo is definitely better on the highway, revving lower for a given speed.

    The 200Tdi/LT77 combo is better off road. Partly to do with the engine revving characteristics / fact the turbo spins up quicker (maybe) but the gear ratios are lower and engine braking is better.

    I wouldn't hesitate to own a 200 again I really enjoyed it, but I'm happy with my 300 too.

    One thing that seems to be the case is that "bits" and accessories are easier to get for the 300Tdi than the 200Tdi - probably due to the fact there are a lot of 300's out there and nowhere near as many 200's.

    Allmy opinion.

    Drive em both and pick the engine that suits you better THEN go and find a good truck with that engine.

    Cheers
    Sagacious advice. I own a 200 and love it to bits, and a lot of my work cars have been 300s and I've enjoyed them too. I have never had any trouble at all getting bits for either motor and never noticed any real difference in that department. Then again, all my time with TDis has been in Africa and the market is a little different there.

    I'd much prefer to work on a 200.

    I know the R380 is a more modern box, but (assuming that the gearbox is a good one) in the bush I prefer an LT77. Now I think about it, I absolutely loved the 200Tdi/LT77 combination in my last work car, "Arnold".....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!