Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: RAF Harrier's final flight before retirement..

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0

    RAF Harrier's final flight before retirement..

    A handout photo made available by British Ministry of Defence showing a parade of pilots marking the decomissioning of GR9 Harrier fighter planes after their last flight, at RAF Cottesmore, Britain, 15 December 2010. The Harrier jump jet made its final operational flight on 15 December 2010, leaving from RAF Cottesmore in Rutland. The aircraft, one of Britain's greatest technical achievements was retired early after falling victim to defense cuts. In celebration of the aircraft, Harriers will pass over seven military bases, the town centers of Stamford and Oakham, and Lincoln Cathedral. The Harriers will be decommissioned in 2011 to be replaced by the Joint Strike Fighter by the end of the decade









  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Harriers will remain in service with the US Marine Corps, who, as I understand it, now own the design. Apparently the poms could not afford a necessary redesign and updates to keep the Harriers competitive.
    URSUSMAJOR

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    arent they not getting a couple of carriers as well?
    The next couple of years would be a prime time to invade England


    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    Harriers will remain in service with the US Marine Corps, who, as I understand it, now own the design. Apparently the poms could not afford a necessary redesign and updates to keep the Harriers competitive.
    Not true, the harrier in UK service, was achiving its peak and recently been upgraded, it was at the best its ever been it would have be a outstanding aircraft.

    Critics point out that the decision to get rid of the Harriers and the flagship aircraft carrier Ark Royal leaves the Royal Navy without a carrier able to operate strike aircraft until the second of two new carriers enters service in 2020, and warn of the risk of being unable to respond flexibly to unexpected events or threats outside the UK during those 10 years.

    They also argued that it would have been cheaper to scrap the Tornado and not lose carrier strike capability, writing: "The existing Tornado force will cost, over 10 years, seven times as much to keep in service as Harrier. Was the recent exercise not supposed to save money?"

    other than the USMC Spanish and Italian navies operate the harrier too.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ballajura, Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    another bad decision made by boys who want fast toys

    Harriers much more versatile and useful

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift View Post
    arent they not getting a couple of carriers as well?
    The next couple of years would be a prime time to invade England


    Why would anyone? A country without much in the way of natural resources, whose once great industries have disappeared mostly due to government policies and interference, a basket case economy, an importer of food and much else, and 60,000,000 disgruntled poms to feed and nurture.

    With the empire long gone, the country's relevance in international affairs is now its waning importance as the aircraft carrier, USS British Isles.
    URSUSMAJOR

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,180
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good time for Argentina to have another crack??

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stuee View Post
    Good time for Argentina to have another crack??
    Or Germany?
    URSUSMAJOR

  9. #9
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    photos 4 and 8 brilliant !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stuee View Post
    Good time for Argentina to have another crack??
    I think it can be said that the UK, could never mount a Falkland Island, size battle group in this day and age. Argentina have recently said that these islands are theres, and they even have the support to some degree of the US ( so much for being our Allies ), but to conduct a invasion is another thing, they don't have the ability to invade the islands, for starters they have limited air to air refuelling capability, utilising old C130's for this role, they cant fly stuff in and out, if they could, they would be soon stopped by the Typhoon squadron down there, who's aircraft are far superior than what they fly, skyhawks still i think, and up graded Mirage. Both east and west island have radar/signal gathering installations, manned 24/7, and theres also another installation on south georgia, plus theres always a sub lurking in the deep, the airfield, as a detachment of Raiper missiles too. So they would be hard pressed to invade and succeed....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!