Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: 265 or 285 ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0

    265 or 285 ?

    Well I am getting ready to put new tyres on my td5 130.

    So what are peoples experiance with 285/75/16's, the tyre shop said it will knock the fuel economy around. He suggested 265/75/16's

    I was wanting to go 285's to get that little bit more under the rear diff.

    Any thoughts

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    cairns
    Posts
    1,675
    Total Downloaded
    0
    255/85/16 will give you the extra clearance without the width.
    And straight on to a 7 inch rim.

    Only issue is bfg muds or coopers, no one else imports them AFAIK.

    Cheers,
    Paul.
    Paul.

    77 series3 (sold)
    95 300Tdi Ute (sold)
    2003 XTREME Td5

    I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stellenbosch, Republic of the Western Cape, RSA
    Posts
    662
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by lambrover View Post
    So what are peoples experiance with 285/75/16's, the tyre shop said it will knock the fuel economy around. He suggested 265/75/16's

    I had 285s on my previous 110 double cab, but I didn't like the feel. I switched to 265s and the truck went better.

    Impact on fuel economy is marginal: remember, different sized tyres also change the odo reading.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gone
    Posts
    1,329
    Total Downloaded
    0
    255x85 BFG km2's on the Puma are fantastic. best move I ever made.

    Allan

  5. #5
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    285 x 0.75 = 213.75
    265 x 0.75 = 198.75
    255 x 0.85 = 216.75
    235 x 0.85 = 199.75

    If you are after that extra height at the expense of a little fuel economy you will get that extra 1/2 inch under your diff with the 255s.

  6. #6
    klappers Guest
    255s for the win

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    thanks guys, I was speaking to Andrew at LRA and he reckons the 255 move in the side wall a bit to much as it is tall so handling is affected where has 285handle better.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a set of 235/85x16 GG TR's, 265/75x16 BFG MT and 305/70x16 Mickey T's Baja ATZ for my Puma. The best tyre for handling is the 305, the handling on tarmac and sand is excellent. The 235's and 265's are a bit soft in the side walls for cornering where as the 305's excel and instil confidence. here is a handy tyre calculator to compare tyre sizes:

    Tire size calculator


    HTH Brian.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,078
    Total Downloaded
    0
    IMO on a Defender 255/85's are the best option.

    As for moving in the sidewall, I've thrashed mine everywhere for years and can't say I ever noticed.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Mudgee-ish
    Posts
    946
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by harro View Post
    255/85/16 will give you the extra clearance without the width.
    And straight on to a 7 inch rim.

    Only issue is bfg muds or coopers, no one else imports them AFAIK.

    Cheers,
    Paul.
    Maxxis have 255/85/16's, but only in 8 ply whereas the KM2 is 10 ply.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!