Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Fuel consumption at highway speed LLams

  1. #1
    NavyDiver's Avatar
    NavyDiver is offline Very Very Lucky! Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    10,246
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Fuel consumption at highway speed LLams

    LLams had a side effect for me while at high speed you might like to consider if you have it. Link

    I wonder how low the fuel use would have been if i had removed my roof rack, did not have 200 odd litres of fuel, took the A.T.R. off and put road tires on and tried this LLams lowering at speed trick
    Not having a full load of 7 people in the car might help a little I guess but where is the fun in that.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I run on the road at onroad height and -20 in LLAMS and have not noticed any difference in fuel consumption and I record every drop consumed.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Dandenong Ranges - Victoria
    Posts
    626
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Many things can make a difference.

    I don't have LLAMS or adjustable height as my D3 has those old fashioned metal coil things at each corner.

    On a recent trip up to Woodend the overall consumption was 7.4L/100km.
    It was sitting at about 9 on the way up, then the run home the distance to empty just kept rising as the rising tailwind pushed us along.
    Much of the return trip (at 100-110kph) was down in the low 5L/100km range.

    I have noticed a difference of around 1-2L/100km between road tyres and M/T.

    I haven't tried driving a complete trip in manual mode and picking up 6th more often, over a short run this seems worthwhile.

    With a 1400kg full height van behind I run around 14-17L/100km depending on conditions.

    If my wife drives the consumption is about 2L/100km higher than me.

    So many variables, so little opportunity to determine what works best.

  4. #4
    NavyDiver's Avatar
    NavyDiver is offline Very Very Lucky! Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    10,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    I run on the road at onroad height and -20 in LLAMS and have not noticed any difference in fuel consumption and I record every drop consumed.

    Garry
    My test was not a perfect test given the hills and fluctuating gradient and strong winds Garry. Playing was interesting and the difference was a noticeable 2 litres per hundred kilometres. I changed several times and reset the fuel usage monitor each time. I did not find any difference twice and did find a difference 3 times. Not a boffin just playing.
    My long range tank has no gauge so I am still blissfully unaware how much more is in it before I get to the main tank.

  5. #5
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    I run on the road at onroad height and -20 in LLAMS and have not noticed any difference in fuel consumption and I record every drop consumed.

    Garry
    Garry, perhaps you can answer this one for me...

    It seems many moons ago, all blokes recorded their MPG...
    I always put it down to lower wages, tighter living costs of the 50s 60s 70s etc.. and perhaps a diagnostic tool for out of adjustment carbies...

    But it seems many still - to this day, log their fuel consumption.

    In a business scenario, where it can all be claimed, and is a cost I can understand..

    But why in a private vehicle?

    When I drive, I fuel the vehicle up.... Whens its low, I fill it up again...

    Consumption has no effect on my driving - I drive because Im going somewhere, if I use 5 litres or 500 litres doesnt matter.

    So why does the practice continue to this day? And with fuel pumps being so poorly calibrated, Temperature / volume fluctuations etc... How can one be certain? And when odometer inaccuracy is taken into account, plus rolling diameter changes due to tyre wear... Well accurate is impossible.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    But why in a private vehicle?

    When I drive, I fuel the vehicle up.... Whens its low, I fill it up again...
    In Jan 94 I took delivery of a new 3.9 Interim Update D1 and as it was my first V8 I started to record fuel consumption to see where I could make it more economical. I sold that D1 3 months later and got one of the very first D1 Updates - again a V8 - it had much worse consumption than the earlier V8 but could be surprisingly economical if you wanted it to be.

    Got into the habit and just kept doing it - takes a second to record in a little book. I have found issues in the vehicle by monitoring fuel consumption. In the 101 - ignition issues had it down to 35l/100km and when fixed back at 20l/100km.

    So habit more than anything - however I just record fill up amounts and when I am the car waiting for someone - I work out the actual consumption for a my entries - passes the time while waiting.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,201
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie
    why does the practice continue to this day? And with fuel pumps being so poorly calibrated, Temperature / volume fluctuations etc... How can one be certain? And when odometer inaccuracy is taken into account, plus rolling diameter changes due to tyre wear... Well accurate is impossible.
    Inaccuracy is ok so long as its a consistent bias, which mostly they are, and things like tyre wear are gradual.
    I definitely learnt a lot about my car from keeping an eye on fuel use - its how I picked up on my leaking D2 fuel pressure regulator.
    Really useful for long trip planning, and understanding tyre pattern and pressure effects, roof-racks and trailers...
    Plus my Dad always did it so of course I do!
    Now 2016 D4 HSE 'Leo' and Steve the Triumph Speed Twin
    Then 2010 D4 3.0 HSE 'James'
    Then 2010 RRS TDV8 'Roger' w traxide DBS, UHF, Cooper Zeons, Superchips remap
    Then 2010 D4 TDV6 'Jumbo' w traxide DBS
    First love 2002 D2 TD5 'Disco Stu'

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!