Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: diesel options

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    3,434
    Total Downloaded
    0

    diesel options

    What are your thoughts on the Isuzu 4jb1 versus the Perkins 4 .182/Mazda HA engines into a series?
    Both geared cam drive.
    Both can be turbo,ed.

    Isuzu kit ex UK cheaper than the Perkins.
    Perkins , wet liners not sure about the 4j.
    Thanks.
    Keith
    Last edited by 123rover50; 20th February 2012 at 06:41 PM. Reason: seems they are both steel head/ meant 4.182

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Barmera .SA.
    Posts
    1,841
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Been a Perkins fan for many years, mainly in boats.

    The beauty of Perkins is the availability of parts, ANY farm machinery place carries them, Massey Ferguson still run Perky engines.

    That being said, I am dropping a Daihatsu 3.8 into my S3 Landy, only reason being, I got the entire engine and 5 speed gearbox nice and cheap.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 123rover50 View Post
    What are your thoughts on the Isuzu 4jb1 versus the Perkins 4.108 / Mazda HA engines into a series?
    Both geared cam drive.
    Both can be turbo,ed.

    Isuzu kit ex UK cheaper than the Perkins.
    Perkins , wet liners not sure about the 4j.
    Thanks.
    Keith
    Isn't the 4.108 1.8L capacity??? In which case there isn't much comparison with a 4JB1.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    What model series are we talking about - the L series diesel out of a Freelander would be a great engine for a series 1. Is ECU controlled but it is first generation ad just turns up injection pump when required (an down as well). Can be tweeked to give about 80kw and 280nm. Is a nice compact engine whose characteristics suit a series setup really well.

    The other obvious engine is the 200tdi or 300tdi - basic has about the same oomph as the L series but can be tweeked a bit more if required. Certainly the 200tdi can basically bolt in with few issues.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    What model series are we talking about - the L series diesel out of a Freelander would be a great engine for a series 1. Is ECU controlled but it is first generation ad just turns up injection pump when required (an down as well). Can be tweeked to give about 80kw and 280nm. Is a nice compact engine whose characteristics suit a series setup really well.

    The other obvious engine is the 200tdi or 300tdi - basic has about the same oomph as the L series but can be tweeked a bit more if required. Certainly the 200tdi can basically bolt in with few issues.

    Garry
    Isn't the L series freeloader diesel the one that has all sorts of head problems???

    The two engines 123 has suggested are largely bulletproof and have timing gears fitted (properly designed and manufactured, unlike the $$$ Zeus abominations).

    After owning a 300Tdi, I wouldn't recommend it be fitted to anything, ever.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Isn't the L series freeloader diesel the one that has all sorts of head problems???

    .
    No, K series 1.8 petrol has liner issues.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Isn't the L series freeloader diesel the one that has all sorts of head problems???
    No - absolutely not - one of the most reliable diesels you will find anywhere.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    4,122
    Total Downloaded
    12.97 MB

    Sleeves in Perkins

    Quote Originally Posted by 123rover50 View Post
    What are your thoughts on the Isuzu 4jb1 versus the Perkins 4.108 / Mazda HA engines into a series?
    Both geared cam drive.
    Both can be turbo,ed.

    Isuzu kit ex UK cheaper than the Perkins.
    Perkins , wet liners not sure about the 4j.
    Thanks.
    Keith
    Hello Keith,

    Not sure which engine you were referring to having wet liners in the line "Perkins, wet liners not sure about the 4J". Knowing stuff all about Perkins motors I went to Wikipedia and they say that the following: [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Perkins_engines"]List of Perkins engines - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    Family type code ..... ED
    Engine Ref no..... 4.108
    Description... Four-cylinder, 108 in³ (1,760 cc) diesel engine. Dry sleeves. Used extensively in vans and cars, Ford Transit, Bedford CA - Opel Blitz, Alfa Romeo Giulia, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, SEAT 131.

    Yes sometimes Wikipedia is not the most reliable of things - so which of the Perkins and the 4J do you think could have wet liners? Or was it another Perkins motor?

    Kind Regards
    Lionel

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    3,434
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sorry guys I stuffed it up.
    I had a 4.108 in my yacht. I really meant the 200 series 4.182 Mazda HA.
    Its higher reving than the Isuzu but dont know much about the Perkins liners.
    Keith

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Scotland
    Posts
    475
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The HA was a popular conversion into vehicles with knackered V8's in the 80's, both N/A and turboed, as was the SLT.
    Both HA's and SLT's were generally regarded as solid reliable engines which were excellent for use in a Land Rover, and as many Range Rovers.
    Unfortunately as the vehicles they were fitted to have rotted out and been scrapped the numbers available have dropped off a lot over here, and when they do come up for sale they command a good price as those in the know are aware how good they are, and will pay good money for them.

    I learned to drive in an SLT powered 2 door Rangie, and scoured the country for one to repower my 110 CSW a couple of years ago.
    I was lucky to find one at a decent price, and have been very impressed with it in terms of power, torque and economy.

    It also has the added bonus of being able to run on just about anything combustable and oily, I find used 0w/30 synthetic makes it go rather well, along with veg oil and a few other combinations.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!