Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: RAAF retiring the C130-H

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Batemans Bay mostly, and Brisbane
    Posts
    255
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Air Vice Marshall Evans interview

    Impending retirement of the C130 Hercules. Air vice Marshall Evans in interview comparing the C130 with a cross between a Cadillac and a Land Rover.

    RAAF farewells flying Cadillacs - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

    Posted here because the C130 was/is- roughly contemporaneous with the S 111 & perentie Land Rovers (34 years).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    RAAF retiring the C130-H

    The ABC has reported the retirement of the C130-H RAAF farewells flying Cadillacs - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

    What are they replacing that capability with?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    wetherill park
    Posts
    2,600
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As far as i know the J model is not retireing but we are getting more c17s we just lose 1 sqn of hercs


    PS: just found this http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/nat...-1226519854974

    seem we are also getting more of the j model

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    RAAF still has J models.

    They also have more C17s than they can crew/use.

    I believe they have also signed a deal for a LTAC replacement....as in a new Caribou type aircraft.

    So they should have all levels of distance, load and access sorted.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    They are looking at further C17's as are the Uk, Congress want to close the line, so more orders would help. Boeing are also seeking civilian certification for the C17.

    The new medium transport is the C27J Spartan, some would say we should have gone with the other tender from Airbus, but as the USAF, is on the vege of retiring all its nearly new C27s, then one wonders why the C27J?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NSW near Queensland border.
    Posts
    3,075
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by juddy View Post
    They are looking at further C17's as are the Uk, Congress want to close the line, so more orders would help. Boeing are also seeking civilian certification for the C17.

    The new medium transport is the C27J Spartan, some would say we should have gone with the other tender from Airbus, but as the USAF, is on the vege of retiring all its nearly new C27s, then one wonders why the C27J?
    Perhaps we should buy the US airforce C27 and refurbish them. The US Airforce also retired their Caribous very early while Australia contnued to use them decades later, but the Caribou did us good service for many years.

    Same with the F111. The USA got rid of them but we continued to use them. And they were a great plane--very capable for what they were designed to do.

    But the US keeps spending Military budgets, and you cannot but new toys while you clutter up the place with the old ones, so in order to always get a new toy they always retire the old ones while they have decades of life left in them.

    And the companies selling the New toys spend billions on the buyers in order to get the orders. So that buyers will always be telling Mummy Purse Strings-- We need that new Toy, buy it for us.

    See the US always want gigantic planes, thinking bigger is better, so a relatively small plane like the C27 does not suit their mentality. And Boeing do want to sell more Planes & Parts, so one that is compatable with the C130 in parts and instrumentation-- a pilot can hop from one to the other, does not suit them so they would be pressurising the US to buy more toys, and discard the old ones.

    I have often thought the C27 would be an ideal Caribou replacement-- Assuming it has no mechanical problems/is not a lemon.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by juddy View Post
    They are looking at further C17's as are the Uk, Congress want to close the line, so more orders would help. Boeing are also seeking civilian certification for the C17.

    The new medium transport is the C27J Spartan, some would say we should have gone with the other tender from Airbus, but as the USAF, is on the vege of retiring all its nearly new C27s, then one wonders why the C27J?
    I don't know what they want more for, they can't use the ones they have. Sure they are in the process of crewing up but is there a need for more? They can't even park the ones they have as they have shared real estate with the MTTR.

    Good question about the C27J.....also made a little gray by the fact that Defence didn't even tender.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnF View Post
    Perhaps we should buy the US airforce C27 and refurbish them. The US Airforce also retired their Caribous very early while Australia contnued to use them decades later, but the Caribou did us good service for many years.

    Same with the F111. The USA got rid of them but we continued to use them. And they were a great plane--very capable for what they were designed to do.

    But the US keeps spending Military budgets, and you cannot but new toys while you clutter up the place with the old ones, so in order to always get a new toy they always retire the old ones while they have decades of life left in them.

    And the companies selling the New toys spend billions on the buyers in order to get the orders. So that buyers will always be telling Mummy Purse Strings-- We need that new Toy, buy it for us.

    See the US always want gigantic planes, thinking bigger is better, so a relatively small plane like the C27 does not suit their mentality. And Boeing do want to sell more Planes & Parts, so one that is compatable with the C130 in parts and instrumentation-- a pilot can hop from one to the other, does not suit them so they would be pressurising the US to buy more toys, and discard the old ones.

    I have often thought the C27 would be an ideal Caribou replacement-- Assuming it has no mechanical problems/is not a lemon.
    How does the C27J compare to the V22 in load and range? I suspect it could fly faster and further. Just wondering if the V22 has reduced the need for the C27.

    There is no real replacement for a Caribou, there is a slight capability shift. They lack the awesome STOL of a Bou...not that they are bad but can't get in where Bous can. However, they are a lot quicker and can fly further. I'm certain they can carry more load.

    However, there were some Australian trials of the LTAC options and all proved to be less robust than the Bou, with damaged props, gear doors and bellys.

    Shed load more reliable I bet though.....LOL!!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    V22, good but very very very expensive....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    The Hercs would be useful for returning illegal immigrants to their countries of origin or to UNHCR camps in some pleasant tropical paradise.
    Not big enough cargo space....however, all those unused C17s....LOL!!!

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!