Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Quick question Puma 130

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Quick question Puma 130

    Hey guys

    is it a case that the Puma 130 still doesn't have ABS and traction control?
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    166
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My 2011 2.4 doesn't and it wasn't an option. Pretty sure this has not changed.

    I have always thought lockers would be more useful than traction control anyway and have not missed the abs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm just wondering what would be best for pulling a horse float the 110 because it has ABS or the 130 because its bigger and I would presume even more stable than the 110.
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Canberra/Melbourne
    Posts
    1,711
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No it doesn't. Neither does the 110 tray back or dual cab.
    [SIGPIC]

    2012 LR Defender 90 (BERT) Gone
    2012 Husqvarna WR 300
    2014 FPV F6 Gone
    2005 D3 SE V8
    2011 D4 V8
    2016 Moto Guzzi California Audace.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    the 130 with about 300kg in the tray just forwards of the rear axle line.

    ABS/TC/any other acronym is just for steerers... Never thought of you as falling into that catagory.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Lou

    Owning both a 110 and a 130,I concur that the 130 will be the better vehicle for your proposed use.The longer wheel base makes the vehicle much more stable,albeit that the 130 is, and feels a much larger vehicle and requires a different driving style.
    Wayne
    ​VK2VRC
    "LandRover" What the Japanese aspire to be
    Taking the road less travelled
    '01 130 dualcab HCPU locked and loaded
    LowRange 116.76:1

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go The 130 lou. Best for your useage I suspect.

    They tow really well.

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    the 130 with about 300kg in the tray just forwards of the rear axle line.

    ABS/TC/any other acronym is just for steerers... Never thought of you as falling into that catagory.
    Thanks Dave

    except my concern is the ABS mostly as I have never driven a car without ABS actually..actually a lie I did once a 2 wheel drive hilux which I did have to hoof the brakes on once due to sudden stop up ahead on motorway, the brakes locked up on me and got some sideways twitch I lifted off the brake and the car sort of kicked back straight and I reapplied the brakes...
    I have no idea whether this was the right or wrong way to deal with the situation it was just the way I reacted.


    .....so my biggest concern was could I drive a car without ABS I'm sure I could but would I react the right way? in the event of an emergency stop and again brakes locking up

    it worries me more if I would have to do it with a float on the back

    I'm not a flat out driver and im very careful with a float on the work car always leaving big gaps and much to peoples dismay I don't tend to travel much over 80 with animals on board.

    I'm just trying to consider my driving experience in all this also.
    obviously a big factor is stability when towing which is why I have been considering, I'm just not sure.
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Robin Falls
    Posts
    230
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi

    Land Rovers rated to 3500kg (some 110 and all 130 variants) don't do ABS and traction control. Something to do with maximum mass for which the braking mechanism can be certified.

    Personally, I prefer driving an ABS and TC free Puma . Less to go wrong in the bush.

    Cheers

    Alan

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Tangambalanga
    Posts
    7,558
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It wont take long to get used to driving without ABS.

    Yeah, you can get caught out, but, if your a reasonable driver and don't "tail gate" then chances are you'll never have to worry about it.
    I've had a couple of close calls, both in the city and the country, because of course, not all emergencies start with tail gating , and if your paying attention, which you should be, considering you'll be towing horses , you shouldn't find it too hard to keep total control of your car.
    The hardest thing to do is steer whilst hard under brakes, doesn't matter whether your on tar or gravel.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!