The tanks may have the same capacity but they do not have the same part numbers so may be a different shape.
Something that has intrigued me for some time and I thought I would finally ask.
Now the the RRS (L320) and the D3 have basically the same floor plan, except the RRS has 5.5inches taken out near the back wheels. This results in the RRS having a wheelbase of 108.1" and the D3 a wheelbase of 113.6". Both vehicles have the same fuel tank of 84litres.
Now given the RRS engine and gearbox unit is in the same position in the chassis as the D3, the extra length in the D3 chassis is just in front of the rear wheels in the area where the fuel tank is.
So if there is technically space for a 5.5" longer tank in the D3 which would probably provide an extra 10-15litres why didn't they put a 5.5" longer tank in the D3 - obvious answer economies of scale in production etc or is there another reason.
Also, seeing there is space for an extra 5.5" what is there - nothing (wasted space) or something else? I have never been under a D3 so not been able to check.
Why is it so??
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
 Swaggie
					
					
						Swaggie
					
					
						The tanks may have the same capacity but they do not have the same part numbers so may be a different shape.
MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa
should be easy enough to get the two part numbers and compare
Current Cars:
2013 E3 Maloo, 350kw
2008 RRS, TDV8
1995 VS Clubsport
Previous Cars:
2008 ML63, V8
2002 VY SS Ute, 300kw
2002 Disco 2, LS1 conversion
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks