Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: K&N air filter

  1. #1
    J.K Guest

    K&N air filter

    Hi all, my 2010 TDV6 D4 is about due for a service, was considering using a K&N air filter as the replacement, any one used these and do they improve performance at all ?

    cheers JK

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Ocean Reef WA
    Posts
    3,098
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If that's the one you smother with oil I wouldn't bother personally. I used one for a while on a 300Tdi Disco I had many years ago and found no difference in anything except the mess to wash it when clogged with dust.
    Threw it out after a couple of trips.
    Now I take a spare OME filter if going off road and also just gently knock much of the dust out if I've been on really dusty tracks. Seems to do the trick OK.
    AlanH.

  3. #3
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A search on this forum should find quite a bit on these filters. (Not much of it very favourable)

    As far as I can see the overall effect is that performance, with boost and fuel quantity controlled by the engine management system, should be unchanged. The reduction in intake silencing should give a significant improvement in the impression of performance (i.e. noisier), and the major reduction in filtering of intake air would see a reduction in engine life, depending on environment , of anything from maybe 10% to 90%.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,127
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    With D2's the thinking is that LandRover brand filters are the most efficeint/effective, I would assume the same in this case also. Aside from using Finer/Uni filters as snorkel socks, I don't think there is a benefit on a 4WD.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    this K&N thing has been flogged extensively in this forum.

    most K&N enthusiasts also have a hi-clone fitted.

    they are both as operationally efficient as each other.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,855
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think there an expensive ****. The ones I've looked at ... sure they will make the inducation a lot louder .... and be fantastic hot air intakes (which will decrease performance for sure). Given I can see daylight through them quite readily ... they are certainly crap at filtering air. They might stop leaves and stones, but they aren't stopping dust if I can see through them .....

    I may have been looking at the "sports" air cleaners though. Who knows, there standard replacement filters might be quite ok ( I'd never use one over a decent ribbed cardboard type aircleaner though .... not in a million years). The surface area for filtering on a well made OEM filters is a million times better than a small see through pod filter.

    seeya
    Shane L.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  7. #7
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yep, as mentioned, good for screening out large insects, stones and kittens from your intake but not much else. Steer clear.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I used one in my D1 for a few years, from my experience providing you oil them correctly they filter better than a cheap paper filter. On really dusty tracks with the paper filters I would get a film of extreemly fine dust on the intake side after a few days, with the correctly oiled K&N it didn't happen. The total opposite from what a lot of people say. The issue is they clog up to quick and too much or not enough oil and that's where the issues arise.
    Would I use one with the D4, no way, just stick with standard
    Discovery 1 4.6, true trac front and rear, superior engineering arms,old tourer now bush toy
    Discovery 4 3.0 HSE MY13 ECB Bull bar, winch, spot lights, aux fuel tank, Kaymar rear bar, duel wheel carriers, 18 tuff ant wheels 265/65/18 BFG KO2's for play

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    K&N filters (and their copies) aren’t known in the automotive industry as ‘rock catchers’ for no reason. They may flow better, but there’s a reason for that. They are quite porous.
    I’ve worked on numerous bikes fitted with them, and have always found dusting on the downstream of the filter in the intake piping.
    You can work out what that means.
    I steer clear of them...

  10. #10
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discomatt69 View Post
    I used one in my D1 for a few years, from my experience providing you oil them correctly they filter better than a cheap paper filter. On really dusty tracks with the paper filters I would get a film of extreemly fine dust on the intake side after a few days, with the correctly oiled K&N it didn't happen. The total opposite from what a lot of people say. The issue is they clog up to quick and too much or not enough oil and that's where the issues arise.
    Would I use one with the D4, no way, just stick with standard
    I guarentee you'd still have dust get past the oil - a memebr who used to frequent here was one of only a handful of filtration Engineers in the country. He did a lot of tests - posted here somewhere - on air filters - OEM, aftermarket, K&N, etc - in all different conditions, brand new, dusty, clogged, just cleaned, oiled or not in the case of the K&N. The K&N always came out at the bottom for filtration - by an alarming amount, and the particulate size they let through was scary.

    No 'I think' or 'a mate said' - actual scientific testing. There are plenty here that have seen tyese results - it would change your mind in a flash.

    I think a well maintained, cleaned but used OEM paper filter scored best for actual filtration - better than a brand new one.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!