"and was heard in NSW because at the time it was lodged, class actions were not possible in Queensland."
I dont follow how this can be heard in NSW, the flood was in Qld and everyone involved was in Qld - given the way our Federation is set up it might as well have been heard in a US court - I don't see that as this is a State issue, how the NSW judgement can apply to a Qld case.
While it sets a precedent in law I don't see how ultimately this will be enforceable on the Qld authorities and NSW has no jurisdiction over Qld matters - I would expect that the High Court that can here such things will be the ultimate arbiter after the appeals have been held.
Is there a lawyer who can explain how NSW can hear this, given how our Federation is set up.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Bookmarks