The inlet isn’t the restriction.
The diameter of the snorkel is, as is its length and transitions in direction etc.
It has been shown that the “Patrol style” pipe snorkels facing backwards perform worse than forward facing versions.
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Hi,
Has anyone done any definitive flow tests on various snorkel heads? I am not so concerned with pipe diameters etc to the airbox, just the snorkel inlet. Thanks in advance.
The inlet isn’t the restriction.
The diameter of the snorkel is, as is its length and transitions in direction etc.
It has been shown that the “Patrol style” pipe snorkels facing backwards perform worse than forward facing versions.
 Fossicker
					
					
						Supporter
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
						SupporterTest Results: Donaldson Precleaner vs Safari RAM vs Toyota Head
Recently I tried a Toyota mushroom head on my 130 300tdi egt raised from around 620 max with a ram head to 650 with the Toyota one on the same hills similar weather and load. Around here your either going up a hill or down a hill, seems to be more uphills though in the tdi.
It’s interesting isn’t it.
I see on the replacement Defender, that the snorkel induction is rear facing, but vertical in its execution. I’m sure the team at JLR have a fair idea of what their up to, as do Safari. Chances are they have or have access to a pretty effective flow bench.
Obviously it’s a way safer/more efficient and cleaner looking option than a three inch piece of pipe bent backwards as a fashion statement.
The factory snorkel on my Puma also draws from the rear of the head.
Regards,
Tote
Go home, your igloo is on fire....
2014 Chile Red L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project
Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....
Factory Puma and Disco 4 RAIs are very restrictive.
By comparison to forward facing offering from Safari.
Even with the Safari, Nuggets filter and pipe work we still generate vacuum on intake of the 90 under throttle.
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						I took the plunge and changed out the cyclonic style head for a Safari type head. Whilst I can't quantify any difference as I don't have a flow bench, it HAS made a difference. The intake roar has increased, so am assuming less restriction and torque is marginally better.
The MAIN reason I like to fit a snorkel/raised air intake is to lessen the amount of dust getting sucked into the air cleaner..
Having the ram head facing forward to me makes sense as having it facing back would suck more dust due the the head creating cavitation..
A forward facing ram head would also assist with the airflow into the engine.
You only get one shot at life, Aim well
2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
4.6m Quintrex boat
20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone
All snorkels have some sort of restriction, even the Safari Armax.
There have been many tests on the Ram effect, but it has been found to be negligible.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks