Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: D4 2.7V6 vs 3.0V6

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Williamstown, Victoria
    Posts
    3,244
    Total Downloaded
    0

    D4 2.7V6 vs 3.0V6

    Apart from capacity and power any reason to avoid the 2.7L?
    I take it that the oil pump issue was only in the D3.
    D2a Td5 Manual, Chawton White. aka "Daisy"
    Build date 11th Oct 2003
    Freelander 2 2011, manual, the daughter calls it Perri
    Before I had a Land Rover I did not have any torque wrenches. Now I have three.
    LROCV #1410

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Nirvana near Albany W.A.
    Posts
    2,480
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Should be in the D3/D4 section, but the 2.7 is the lesser of the 2 evils, especially in the D4. In other words less generally goes wrong with the 2.7 ( engine wise anyway, maintenance needs to be kept very high on both )

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had a MY11 D4 2.7 and a MY14 SDV6. More power in the SDV6 and a lot less turbo lag. Did >100k in both with no serious dramas.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Perth, AU
    Posts
    1,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    No need to avoid either engine - every D4 after 2012 was a 3.0L, so plenty of those engines about.

    Only avoid a poor service history.
    2010 TDV6 3.0L Discovery 4 SE remapped to RRS output, Alaska White, GME XRS-330c, IIDTool BT, Dual Battery, Apple CarPlay, OEM Retrofitted: Cornering lights, Door card lights, Power + Heated Seats, Logic 7 audio

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohica View Post
    Apart from capacity and power any reason to avoid the 2.7L?
    No,the 2.7 D4 is actually generally less problematic than the 3.0L.But there are not many around.

    And if you want a bit less lag,and more go,there are tunes around.

    Had a BAS tune done to mine,made quite a difference,more power and torque,and reduced lag,with no change in fuel economy.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kalgoorlie WA
    Posts
    5,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    No,the 2.7 D4 is actually generally less problematic than the 3.0L.But there are not many around.

    And if you want a bit less lag,and more go,there are tunes around.

    Had a BAS tune done to mine,made quite a difference,more power and torque,and reduced lag,with no change in fuel economy.
    Did the same tune on mine at the same time as egr blanking & deletion. Noticed a significant reduction in turbo lag off the mark, but haven't really noticed anything else different.
    Mine always did go well though (once it got moving away from a standing start). It still puts a smile on my face when some Toyota jockey (and there are plenty of them around here) tries to demonstrate how good his V8 Land Cruiser is ............. and embarrasses himself.
    Cheers .........

    BMKAL


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    24
    Total Downloaded
    0

    A vote for the 2.7

    A bit late on this thread but it is worth noting that the 2.7 engine new can still be found new for about $12k and can be obtained second hand from a Ford Territory, whereas huge amounts quoted for repairing the 3.0 are occasionally mentioned. A transmission tune from Cameron at Old Jaguar in Sydney also helps!

    But yes, failures in the 3.0 seem to be anecdotally rare given the numbers on the road and kms being done, so I guess worrying about a crank going may be too pessimistic.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!