I've put about 50,000 kms on a V8. The onboard computer reads about 10% lower fuel consumption compared to filling the tanks (I have a LRA 110 l aux tank). My records so far show using the fill-up calculation (computer results in brackets):
Economy driving on highway at 100km/hr; 13.5-14.0 (12.7-13.7)
Fast driving on highway at 115 km/hr; 14.5-15.5 (13.5-14.7)
In town -suburban Perth- no load; 16.0-18.0 (15.2-16.6)
On highway with 1000kg trailer at 100km/hr; 15.5-17.0 (14.7-16.4)
On highway with trailer at 115 km/hr; 16.6-18.0 (16.1-17.5)
Axle-deep soft sand driving full throttle for 90 kms; 25.0-39.0(but was having too much fun to notice what the computer says
)
Low range 4WD over rocks and generally mucking about it burns about 10 litres/hr irregardless of the speed.
It seems that it makes no difference if the roofrack is on/off, the internal load, and with MTRs on the weeks, the consumption increases about 5% compared to Scorpions (I've 2 sets of wheels). I find that 98 octane gives 5% better consumption figures than 95 octane. The above figures are with 98 octane.
My D3 is a 2005 demo and was $28k less than the HSE diesel, so I have to drive about 1 million kms to buy the difference in fuel. My intention is to have it scratched and jarred to bits by then but so far despite my best efforts there are only scratches to show.



Reply With Quote
(but was having too much fun to notice what the computer says
,, an the best bit,, I DIDENT HAVE TO PAY FOR THE FUEL!!!!


Bookmarks