Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Photo's on aboriginal land, whats the go

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NW Tassie
    Posts
    1,884
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Photo's on aboriginal land, whats the go

    Am I reading the permit system right that you are not allowed to take photograths on aboriginal land whilst travelling over them
    cheers
    blaze

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Horsley Park, Sydney
    Posts
    2,939
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bblaze View Post
    Am I reading the permit system right that you are not allowed to take photograths on aboriginal land whilst travelling over them
    cheers
    blaze
    We have never had any problems taking photos of the land. However, if you want to take photos of the Aboriginal people themselves, it is polite to ask permission first (as would be the case with others - ie non Aborigial folk as well).

    In 99.9% of the cases, you will have no problems and they will LOVE to have their pics taken with you, or your vehicle, or the surrounding area. In fact they will most likely want to look at the results on your digital camera.

    The smiles from the kids are wonderful

  3. #3
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Some sacred sites may be off-limits. The most famous of these is probably Uluru. As with any photography the rights and beliefs of the people should be respected.

    As Bundalene mentioned is the norm though.
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think this might be an issue of private vs commercial photography.

    I am not sure about Aboriginal land in general, but places like the City of Sydney has permit (and fees) system for commercial photography, ie anything that will make you money. This applies to any Commonwealth property or structure.

    At Uluru, same thing applies - private photos are OK, commercial photography requires a permit. Photography of sacred sites is a no-no.

  5. #5
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Generally speaking there are no restrictions on photography on or from public land. But once you are on private land the restrictions are whatever the owners want to make them. So the question is, is the aboriginal land public or private? The answer is probably private if you need a permit, although if you do not, it may mean you are on a public road through private land, and there are no restrictions (provided the photo is taken from the road).

    In practice, as indicated above, there are unlikely to be any problems provided you are sensible and ask people if you can photograph them or their houses - even if not legally required, it is the polite thing to do.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ballajura, Perth, WA
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    it's a belief system the aboriginal people have about having their images taken as well as showing images of people who have died being shown.

    That's why ABC will for example will run a warning that the film or show may have pictures of deceased people and may offend aboriginal viewers or on other occasions say picture or image of deceased person withheld due to respect to community.

    They also don't like sacred sites being photographed and a sacred site to them could be any geographical marker or tree etc doesn't have to a a spectacular looking thing either in my experience could be a clump of stones on ground.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    53
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In 1995 i was at Warbuton in WA. I was video recording the petrol station and some of the surrounds. Off in the distance is the true town of Warbuton and from there came a ute full of aboriginals who demanded i hand over the camcorder for breach of permit. I refused and a verbal arguemnet developed. Eventually a respected white town offical arrived and we talked. It was agreed that if the white guy didnt see anything that put them in a bad light then i could keep the camcorder.

    I kept the camcorder and learnt my lesson. Ok video is different to stills, but the same rule applies...be careful

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    NW Tassie
    Posts
    1,884
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Reason for the question was because it is clearly stated in the the permit application that no photo's can be taken on aborignal land, links here
    Accept Conditions
    http://www.dia.wa.gov.au/templates/E...ermitForm.aspx
    On the first link it is on the linked page, second link you will need to search for the info but I did read it somewhere.
    So with respect to the landowners I was asking what is acceptable, They take millions of photo's of the rock which seems acceptable to the landowners but maybe not a pic of some obscure sanddune/tree. With no disrespect, maybe its about money and how the rules apply.
    Thanks for all comments thus far
    cheers
    blaze

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!