Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Fuel pills, ionizers, hydrogen boosters and other rip offs..

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Fuel pills, ionizers, hydrogen boosters and other rip offs..

    Here's a short podcast on the subject. If you are a believer or an investor looking for that "big" winner", do not listen to this


    Ockham's Razor - 30 August 2009 - Fuel saving follies

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    629
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I put in a fitch fuel saver one time. It did give me exactly 7% better economy, and I took it off for a month and continued documenting economy, then I put it back on and the 7% came and went with the fitch. It cost over $400. Anyway I sold the car and didnt remove it, I wish I had now because the new owner would not have known. The good news is you can easily get 7% by keeping your engine tuned properly, tyres hard and driving with lighter shoes.

    As for the fuel saving devices in general I think its a load of tripe and I am very skeptical.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    5,901
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Heya Mark - what is that on your Avitar? Do you have mutant giant bats over your way?
    2007 Defender 110
    2017 Mercedes Benz C Class. Cabriolet
    1993 BMW R100LT
    2024 Triumph Bonneville T120 Black

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's actually a snatch strap but I'll admit it look like road kill or what not

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,722
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am a geophysicist, and it may come as a surprise that this sort of thing (similar to fuel savers etc) is not uncommon in the supposedly scientific area of exploration. In fact so common that the very first issue of the first specialist journal in geophysics ("Geophysics") in 1935 carried an article on how to recognise such scams. How much things (didn't) change is shown by the fact that the article was reprinted unchanged fifty years later.

    I don't have it in front of me but from memory the article points out that it is easy to recognise such scams. A key feature is that their method of operation is a trade secret, and there is no published independent testing, and there will be testimonials by ordinary users, and often a story about how the invention has been suppressed.

    Sound familiar?

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!