Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 53

Thread: Headlamps - To HID or not to HID?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,447
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scott oz View Post
    I fitted HID's and love them.

    They draw the same current and better light output. So regardless you should upgrade your wiring.

    It is subjective and personel if the added output is an advantage or not

    As they say each to their own


    Not to go soft on this:

    No it is not subjective...and it can be measured. Current draw is not relevant in this argument. The design of lights and lighting quality is engineering based on science. Hence the regulations.

    No it is not personal....it is not just about you: the quality of the light is not only in the eyes of the driver but more importantly for road safety also in the eyes of the beholder.

    Yes if you want HID lights then buy a Discovery 4 because the whole lighting system has been designed to distribute the light effectively and safely better that any HID-tricked up-designed-for-halogen-system.
    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  2. #42
    scott oz Guest
    one iota,

    Some people will replace their bulbs if they believe they will get better light performance without increased current draw. Others will increase performance by higher wattage bulbs and associated increased current draw. So current draw may or may not be important. It’s personal.

    Sorry but if my eye performance is better with halogen than with HID's then that's personal. And if I prefer to drive with the whiter HID light that's personal.

    Driving with lights that are incorrectly adjusted is discourteous to other road users and may be dangerous in given circumstances.

    If you have HID’s have them adjusted properly and I hope you like them.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,447
    Total Downloaded
    0


    I don't question the "brilliance" of HID lighting. It is superior to halogen watt for volt for lumen.

    It's just that the internationally accepted regulations require self levelling lights with washed lenses....and why...because without those things the glare emitted is a problem for everyone else...that is my argument.

    Just ask your vehicle inspector when you declare you have them at the next registration/road worthy inspection or ask your insurer...
    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  4. #44
    scott oz Guest
    one iota,

    Agree.

    I have the low halogen and high HID which makes them legal as I understand it. Regardless they are correctly adjusted

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NE Victoria
    Posts
    51
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by one_iota View Post
    I support that view. The lights on my defender are more than adequate for city driving after a wiring upgrade and +50 halogen bulb upgrade.

    Aftermarket HID's can be a distraction to others and are not legal for good reason...you might be able to see better but everyone else is left less able to see because of the glare. The more I "see" them the less I tolerate them.

    As said above it's not just the lamp its the whole assembly that makes the light.
    If the lights are not focussed properly they will cause unnecessary and annoying glare, as will all lights be they tungsten or halogen. As I mentioned, mine are correctly focussed and do not cause a problem.

    cheers

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NE Victoria
    Posts
    51
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scott oz View Post
    I fitted HID's and love them.

    They draw the same current and better light output. So regardless you should upgrade your wiring.

    It is subjective and personel if the added output is an advantage or not

    As they say each to their own
    As I understand it, HID draws less current than equivalent or less halogen globes?

    cheers

  7. #47
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,535
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stony View Post
    As I understand it, HID draws less current than equivalent or less halogen globes?

    cheers
    Generally speaking the HID draws a lot less - usually less than half*, so upgraded wiring is probably not justified, although since some of them are more sensitive to voltage you need to make sure there are no bad connections. This despite producing a lot more light.

    * depends what you are comparing it to - I think most HID are around 25w, halogens vary typically from 55-100w and can be higher. I seem to recollect that most HID produce something of the order of ten times the light produced by halogens - which, however, vary quite a bit. And then there is the effectiveness of the reflector/lens combination in both cases.

    Extra light, it perhaps should be pointed out, is not an unmixed advantage - while it is useful to have a bit of extra light to see the roos further off, you have to remember that your eyes lose their dark adaptation if there is too much light - this is particularly noticeable when you drop to low beam, when too bright a light means you cannot see outside the area of your beam at all, but also I find some of the big reflecting signs quite painful just with halogen high beam plus el cheapo driving lights.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #48
    scott oz Guest
    If you look at HID's they will quote the wattage and the kelvin scale.

    If you run 55 W low and 75W high in either a standard bulb or HID they draw the same current 55/75.

    The difference is the "light" that each put out.

    If you are happy with your current lights and just wish to reduce the current draw then you may find say a 25w low 35w H HID will give you the same usable light as standard 55/75 but draws less currrent.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scott oz View Post
    <snip>

    If you run 55 W low and 75W high in either a standard bulb or HID they draw the same current 55/75.

    The difference is the "light" that each put out.
    The wattage is a measurement of power and is the product of the voltage multiplied by the current.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had the first decent opportunity to test my upgraded lighting out over the weekend and it is perfect, requires no alteration. I have 35w 4300k HID driving lights and +90% 60/55w halogen headlights with Traxide loom, the most sensible and legal option. (By sensible I mean the colour temperature. Philips OEM bulbs used by the major German players are all 4300/5000k). The low beam wasn't an issue, but I am young and I don't smoke or do other things deleterious to one's sight.

    Interestingly I was only flashed once on my return journey, perhaps lutum accretions were causing the light to scatter, although the spot beam was pointing straight into another vehicle on a left hander on the opposite side of the dual carriageway.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!