Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: How long till we lose the current iconic deefer shape??

  1. #11
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,516
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    I think a D4 ute/trayback would be a great vehicle, but I suspect it would also need to be stretched to make it usable and would that detract from the market sector that JLR is aiming Discovery?
    I expect it to be stretched, with at least two different wheelbases, and look nothing like a Discovery, in the same way that there is little apparent resemblance between the Discovery and RRSport. I would also expect that there would be some beefing up of the underpinnings, in the same way that there was going from the RR to the 110. This would avoid it impinging on the upmarket image of the Discovery.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    I expect it to be stretched, with at least two different wheelbases, ...

    John
    I reckon a 110 FC (Forward Control) with Van / Ambulance / 12 seater Bus / Tray / Dual Cab / Camper .... body options would be a good addition to the stable.

    TDV6 + (Auto option) + (Hybrid Diesel - Elec Option) + (Air Suspension Option for height / loading) + (Front / Rear Climate Control) + (ABS & TC and locking Front & Rear diffs - to compete with G-Wagen). But the back windows should still be sliding ones, so they can rattle.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    under a rock, next to a tree, at Broadmarsh
    Posts
    6,738
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Anything on the new defender shape yet?

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael2 View Post
    I reckon a 110 FC (Forward Control) with Van / Ambulance / 12 seater Bus / Tray / Dual Cab / Camper .... body options would be a good addition to the stable.

    TDV6 + (Auto option) + (Hybrid Diesel - Elec Option) + (Air Suspension Option for height / loading) + (Front / Rear Climate Control) + (ABS & TC and locking Front & Rear diffs - to compete with G-Wagen). But the back windows should still be sliding ones, so they can rattle.
    Hi All

    I read this posting and thought yummy, I like the idea of a 110 FC camper with all the goodies.

    Anything on the new defender shape yet?

    Cheers Arthur

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,496
    Total Downloaded
    0
    its gone already...


    can you say "powerbulge" its marketwankspeak for "Our engineers couldnt work out how to fit the engine in properly"
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    I think 2014 is about right - with the proviso that the Defender may possibly continue as with the RR Classic, only built in India or China. But whether that version would be allowed under ADRs is another matter!

    The problem is that while redesigning the Defender to meet all new rules would be quite possible, it would be too expensive for the number being built, so it is almost certain to change to the D3/D4 platform to use their already paid for development cost. I expect a D3/4 restyled to look a bit like a Defender, in the same way that a "Hummer" is an off the shelf Chevrolet restyled to look a bit like an HMMWV.

    John
    John, I read recently (on a news feed) that Tata had ruled out the D3 chassis as a future platform due to it's excessive weight. The same article said that the next gen Range Rover would be a 7 seater and weigh about 700kg less. So in view of weight considerations the Defender (Icon) project was back to th drawing board. Maybe a Bowler space frame - or not.

  6. #16
    richard4u2 Guest
    lets hope they dont go down the same road as toyota did, far out that is ugly

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Hobart, Tasmania
    Posts
    73
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    There was a picture floating around a few years ago of a new discovery ute.
    This one I reckon

    "Land Rover Discovery Ute" Fine Art Print by robertp | RedBubble

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Lets all hope that whatever new shape happens, that LR listen to its buyers, - and more importantly, those who trade OUT of LR products.

    The majority of them would want value for their dollar and to own a vehicle that is Reliable, sensible in design, ergonomically correct, - though I'd settle for "Vastly improved" - and made of materials and methods that are durable and Fit-For-Purpose . This includes ease of maintenance and omitting technology for the sake of technology, such as LCD screens instead of 'real' gauges that work....

    I doubt if the idiots who designed and spec'd my Classic left LR after 1995... - Bet they were promoted !

    Disappointed James in Gosnells

    The 'EH', 95 Classic Vogue SE with *working* air suspension... (!) - and stuffed viscous at 156K...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!