Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: How do you calculate load bearing of metal tubes ??

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    313
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by slug_burner View Post
    rijidij,

    If this diagram is a fair representation of one of your tube carriers then I think that the material that you will join the tube to will be a good guide as to the wall thickness required of your tube. Given that the wheel carrier is made of mild steel and if you are to weld to it or even if you clamped somehow I'd want about the same wall thickness on both pieces. To be sure go the 3.2mm wall thickness but 2.0mm might do it, I suspect that it is not worth the effort to save on weight or cost and just go with the 3.2mm.

    Gumnut could probably help Mr Squiggle out as he has laid out a method.

    Well, using the diagramme above, what we could do is sum the anti-clockwise moments (nil) and clockwise moments, ignoring weight of tube = about 350Nm, and working backwards, and if you wanted to use the sound method described by Jekeslouw, the equivalent load at the end is about 35kg.

    Maybe make a prototype, hang half a chaff bag of sand on the end of it, and pick a quiet and quite bumpy road to test it on......

  2. #12
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gumnut View Post
    Well, using the diagramme above, what we could do is sum the anti-clockwise moments (nil) and clockwise moments, ignoring weight of tube = about 350Nm, and working backwards, and if you wanted to use the sound method described by Jekeslouw, the equivalent load at the end is about 35kg.

    Maybe make a prototype, hang half a chaff bag of sand on the end of it, and pick a quiet and quite bumpy road to test it on......
    I take it that is using 2g as the force?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have done exactly these calculations before, I have no idea where they went and I still haven't got around to building that bike rack.

    Most people I know used 1" NB pipe which is actually 33.4mm OD. You can step down to 3/4" NB pipe which is 26.7mm OD and commonly comes in wall thickness of:
    2.87mm (med wall or SCH40)
    3.91mm (SCH80)

    My steel catalogues show 25mm OD boiler tube is available with a wall thickness of 2.9mm, ERW tube (electric seam welded) is only available to 2mm wall.

    For the medium wall (SCH40) pipe your SMOA (geometric property that is basically resistance to bending) is 1.55e-8 m^4.
    Working off a safe maximum stress of 120MPa (good fatigue life even when welded, yield factor of safety roughly 2, breakage factor of safety roughly 3) this pipe can support a bending moment of 140Nm at our chosen stress level.

    Your four bikes as a point load are 60kg at 0.25m from the support.
    BM = 60x9.81x0.25
    BM = 147 Nm.

    But that is total and spread over two prongs. Each prong is subject to half that which is roughly 74Nm.

    20NB med wall pipe prongs can take a design load of 140Nm (including fatigue, impact loading etc) and only have to take 74Nm.

    So yeah the 20NB medium wall pipe is fine and gives you plenty of scope to add padding. Anything bigger and stronger is also perfectly fine. Obviously this analysis is simplified and free, but the results are in line with what has been proven to work.
    1" (25.4mm OD) tube may be hard to find with a suitable wall thickness.

    I'll be using 1" NB pipe (33.4mm OD) when I get around to building my rack. I need to build a square receiver towbar to fit it first.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    would shs be stronger than round for the same OD, wall thickness

  5. #15
    rijidij's Avatar
    rijidij is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SW of Geelong
    Posts
    2,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by slug_burner View Post
    Given that the wheel carrier is made of mild steel and if you are to weld to it or even if you clamped somehow I'd want about the same wall thickness on both pieces.......
    Quote Originally Posted by bee utey View Post
    Where the 25mm tube is welded to the upright is where trouble will start. The stress concentration at the weld point is the main weakness..........
    I was thinking along the lines of sleeving or clamping rather than welding, but I haven't got that far yet.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    .........Most people I know used 1" NB pipe which is actually 33.4mm OD. You can step down to 3/4" NB pipe which is 26.7mm OD and commonly comes in wall thickness of:
    2.87mm (med wall or SCH40)
    3.91mm (SCH80)
    The main reason I'm thinking 25.4mm OD is I'm looking at using Thule brand cradles and straps and they fit on 1" (25.4mm) round tube.
    Also, Thule make a 'No Sway Cage' which also clamps on the 1" tube and prevents the bikes from swinging back and forth.
    It seems that Thule parts are available to purchase as separate items, I'm just waiting to hear back from a couple of places regarding price etc.

    Thule Cradle


    No sway cage



    Thanks for all the replies.

    Cheers, Murray
    '88 County Isuzu 4Bd1 Turbo Intercooled, '96 Defender 130 CC VNT
    '85 Isuzu 120 Trayback, '72 SIIA SWB Diesel Soft Top
    '56 SI Ute Cab


  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    313
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=Dougal;1603340]I have done exactly these calculations before, I have no idea where they went and I still haven't got around to building that bike rack.


    Your four bikes as a point load are 60kg at 0.25m from the support.
    BM = 60x9.81x0.25
    BM = 147 Nm.


    Errr,

    I do not think that it is appropriate to add up the weights and halve the length.

    A more accurate and appropriate method is to work out each bending moment, and sum the moments.

    This method would provide for a point load of approx 140kg at 0.25m from support. Whoops, back to year five remedial maths for me - should be half that - approx 70kg, depending on exact placement of clamps.

    But maybe things work out different like in NZ......
    Last edited by Gumnut; 7th January 2012 at 01:00 PM. Reason: Mathematical error

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    would shs be stronger than round for the same OD, wall thickness
    Yes it is. It is also usually a stronger grade of steel, yeild around 350MPa instead of 200-250MPa for basic pipe.


    Murray, I understand the convenience of using the Thule clamps. But I've found things that lumpy often stop you being able to slide a bike on. The standard setup on my mates racks (I'm still using the old hook type) is foam padding to about 2" OD. This fits the biggest variation in bike types. To seperate the bikes and prevent damage I just use split foam pipe insulation cut to 100-200mm lengths on the contact points. It holds itself well on forks, frames and pedals. The bikes are tied back to the main spar of the rack to prevent sway.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gumnut
    Errr,

    I do not think that it is appropriate to add up the weights and halve the length.

    A more accurate and appropriate method is to work out each bending moment, and sum the moments.

    This method would provide for a point load of approx 140kg at 0.25m from support.

    But maybe things work out different like in NZ......
    It's correct, here is the full working, but more accurate this time.

    4x bikes at 15kg spaced at 50, 200,350 and 500mm from the point of attachment.

    Lumped mass (as I did it, but more accurate this time)
    60kg centred at (50+200+350+500)/4= 275mm
    Moment = 60*9.81*0.275
    Moment = 162 Nm.

    Sum of individual moments.
    Moment = 15*9.81*(0.05+0.2+0.35+0.5)
    Moment = 162Nm

    Exactly the same result. I'm a mech eng, I get paid to do this for a living. This situation is exactly the same as load centres on forklift prongs. It's the distance to the centre of mass that matters.

    Your real moment is going to be less because the bikes will be closer together than that.
    Another big consideration is the prong spacing. Some of my mates run theirs at 600mm, which works great for big bikes but I think I'd struggle to get my wife's Intense to sit nicely. I was going to make one at 500mm spacing, the smaller commercial racks are 400-450mm

  8. #18
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    ok, now that we have the sum of moments sorted.

    How did you turn the maximum safe working stress of 120MPa to a bending moment of 140Nm?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by slug_burner View Post
    ok, now that we have the sum of moments sorted.

    How did you turn the maximum safe working stress of 120MPa to a bending moment of 140Nm?
    Stress = Moment*Distance from NA to surface/SMOA

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Engadine - In the Shire, 1 hr South of Sydney
    Posts
    2,050
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Gumnut, Dougal is correct and I was going to state that even before I read he was an engineer. I teach this stuff( at a basic level) at TAFE.
    Why don't you go somewhere like Rebel sport or roof rack city and measure the tubing size and use the same sizes (yeah - assume 3.2 thick) and it'll probably hold up a horse

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!