Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: Tandem Suspension Concept

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Is it my imagination that the caravan is handling the bumpy track (end of video) better than the Tojo ?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,505
    Total Downloaded
    0
    nope airbags'll do that for ya.

    Whats really fun is when you join the front and the rear on the same side together Boy does that allow for some great articulation.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Torres Straits
    Posts
    3,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks muchly for all input.
    Essentially the task at hand boils down to whether I want the hassle of running such a heavy boat offroad (5m glass wahoo).

    Tandem, although heavier will reduce point loadings in the soft stuff. With tandem I would run smaller wheel/tyres (14"LT). Which has benefits of keeping the hull closer to the deck for beach launching.

    The rationale for the above design was keeping as much suspension stuff out of the salt.
    The camelback leaf setup would rust as quickly as most other leafies!

    Other option is to simply run a single axle with triangulated 4link as I have done in the past. Maybe Im just a little precious - plenty of 1tonne-ish single axle camper trailers trundling around.

    Hmmm

    Steve
    '95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
    '10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by roverrescue View Post

    The rationale for the above design was keeping as much suspension stuff out of the salt.
    The camelback leaf setup would rust as quickly as most other leafies!

    Steve
    How about 2 leaf Parabolics? Don't seize up with rust like multileaf semi elliptics.
    Bill.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Parabolics can give a more....elegant ride too

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by roverrescue View Post
    Thanks muchly for all input.
    Essentially the task at hand boils down to whether I want the hassle of running such a heavy boat offroad (5m glass wahoo).

    Tandem, although heavier will reduce point loadings in the soft stuff. With tandem I would run smaller wheel/tyres (14"LT). Which has benefits of keeping the hull closer to the deck for beach launching.

    The rationale for the above design was keeping as much suspension stuff out of the salt.
    The camelback leaf setup would rust as quickly as most other leafies!

    Other option is to simply run a single axle with triangulated 4link as I have done in the past. Maybe Im just a little precious - plenty of 1tonne-ish single axle camper trailers trundling around.

    Hmmm

    Steve
    If you are going to run in salt water regularly you are going to get rust no matter what preventative measures you take. The available coatings only delay the inevitable.

    Have a look at Chalmers or Mitchell suspensions. They are load sharing and use rubber springs. As there is no friction damping from leaf springs, they need shock absorbers.

    Get your drawing (key)board out.
    URSUSMAJOR

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Torres Straits
    Posts
    3,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Certainly a possibility.
    I like the simplicity of the camelback design.
    There is a springmaker in Cairns... spose I could make a trip to the big smoke - seems a little excessive though Brad could probably organise 2 leaf para-whatevers!!!

    More red to be drunk before deciding!!!

    S
    '95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
    '10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Someone on another thread mentiond modern Transit Vans have Paras on the back. I run single leaf Paras on the back of my series 2 Bitsa. They are off early Transit front axles. You could double them up if necessary. The 'walking' action of this design gives a relatively smooth ride even if the springs are a bit rusty. As an example, the chassis of a single axle trailer with rusted/seized springs will rise vertically a distance of 100mm when riding over say a 100mm bump. With centrally pivoted load sharing 'walking' type suspension the chassis only rises 50mm.In fact, there have been a few trucks and trailers built with unsprung walking beams pivoting directly off the chassis.

    I was looking at the Bell crank horizontal coil front suspension on an old Rover 2000 P6 the other day, and it reminded me of the tandem rear suspension of a World War 2 German Kruppe 6x4 truck. A bell crank on each axle on each side, pivoting from the chassis were inteconnected by a single horizontal coil spring.
    Bell crank type radius arms could be welded up from old RangeRover bits, but you would then need Panhard rods for lateral location.
    Bill.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As well as the feedback given already, I think it's all well and good to have the springs load-sharing, but dampers should be between the axle and the chassis. Just stops one more potential shake.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by roverrescue View Post
    [snip]

    More red to be drunk before deciding!!!

    S
    Now ya talking Steve

    BTW, to have any sort of lateral stability with what you've drawn you'd need a very wide link at you chassis pivot point. eg two pivots 2-300mm apart.
    Have a look at some of the off road trailer trailing arm suspensions

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!