Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 33

Thread: Trailing arm which one would be best?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by subaveragemuppet View Post

    Super Pro bushes fix that and you end up with a bucket load more flex too

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I already use superpro
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  3. #23
    n plus one Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by dullbird View Post
    Hey Guys

    Ian Bent the rear trailer arm today while off roading so as I have the luxury of not having to use this car as a daily driver..it can sit in the shed until I can afford to put Heavy duty Rear radius arms.

    I had a quick look and came across two on a short search.

    these ones from APT

    APT Fabrication for Land Rover parts - Cranked rear trailing arms pair 2" lift

    Of these ones from Terrafirma

    Land Rover :: Accessories :: TERRA FIRMA Rear Castor Corrected Trailing arms (cranked suit lifted vehicles) PAIR Discovery 1, Range Rover Classic & Defender - Complete 4X4 - 4wd parts and accessories

    now they are both the same price they both seem to have the same wall thickness but I think the apt ones are slightly larger in diameter only a little

    however the APT are made from cold drawn welded tube and the Terras are made from co0ld drawn seamless should this come in to the decision making? or ultimately does it not matter?
    Watching with interest as I just fitted TF radius arms to my 110 and am now considering APT or TF cranked arms to relieve the rear bushes.

    Anyone know if either are longer than standard - my rear wheels are definitely attle further forward than they used to be....

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dullbird View Post
    ...

    however the APT are made from cold drawn welded tube and the Terras are made from co0ld drawn seamless should this come in to the decision making? or ultimately does it not matter?
    Don't let welded vs seamless influence your decision making in the slightest.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Near Seven Hills, Sydney
    Posts
    4,342
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by n plus one View Post
    Watching with interest as I just fitted TF radius arms to my 110 and am now considering APT or TF cranked arms to relieve the rear bushes.

    Anyone know if either are longer than standard - my rear wheels are definitely attle further forward than they used to be....
    I have noticed that too, some brands of aftermarket trailing arms seem short. When comparing a pair of 110s each with 3" lift on flat ground, one had Equipe arms the other Gwyn Lewis, the Equipe equipped 110 appeared to have a shorter wheelbase. Wouldn't have been by much but visually it was noticeable.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The Foundry 4x4 items when compared the std defender ones were exact same length.

    careful fitting the wrong length trailing arms, the rear diff flange will no longer be in the same plane as the tc output flange, you could get out of phase vibrations & uj / spline wear

    rather than using cranked arms you can get the same effect by using nolathane 48040 bushes, each half is angled about 15 deg and thus point your arms down toward the axle,( the center of its travel) . rather than horizontal, which is more like the upper limit of travel. that is probably why the std ones dont last. (apart from them being made by Britpart)

    I haven seen a superpro so can't comment if they are the same

    Before


    After




    they are going strong, after 4 months outback touring (towing van) they still look new

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by goingbush View Post
    ...

    rather than using cranked arms you can get the same effect by using nolathane 48040 bushes, each half is angled about 15 deg and thus point your arms down toward the axle,( the center of its travel) . rather than horizontal, which is more like the upper limit of travel. that is probably why the std ones dont last. (apart from them being made by Britpart)

    I haven seen a superpro so can't comment if they are the same

    ...

    they are going strong, after 4 months outback touring (towing van) they still look new
    No the superpro are completely different and a MUCH better design IMHO. My SuperPro bushes have been in for >3 years now and are still like new.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    No the superpro are completely different and a MUCH better design IMHO. My SuperPro bushes have been in for >3 years now and are still like new.

    The same SP bushes on mine (chassis end, upper trailing arm) have now gone well past 200,000km and are still fine.

    The OE ones were flogged out by 80,000km encouraging lots of rear/roll steer, but standard rubber ones are superior, so the www experts would have us believe

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I fitted SP's when I lived in NSW which was 6 years ago and they are as good today as the day I fitted them. Pat

  10. #30
    n plus one Guest
    APT fab cranked arms on their way - will provide update shortly...

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!